boston personal injury lawyer

CHARLESTOWN ASSAULT AND BATTERY LAWYER

The crime is punished.
You still need to heal.

A criminal case punishes the attacker but pays you nothing. A civil claim, often against a business whose neglect allowed the attack, is how you recover. Larson Law will pursue it.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBC News Boston logo

What a Charlestown assault and battery claim involves

Being attacked leaves more than physical wounds. The injuries can be severe, and the fear, sleeplessness, and trauma that follow are often just as lasting. Many victims assume that if the attacker is arrested, the system will take care of them. It usually does not. A criminal case is brought by the Commonwealth to punish the offender, and even when it succeeds, it rarely puts anything in the victim’s hands. A separate civil claim is how a victim of assault and battery actually recovers for the harm they suffered.

That is where these cases turn. Getting real compensation after an attack, the medical care, the counseling, the lost income, and the pain and trauma it causes, takes a civil claim pursued separately from the criminal case, and often against a business or property owner whose neglect made the attack possible. Our firm does that work, the same way we handle the wider Boston personal injury attorney practice, through our Boston assault and battery lawyer team, and just up the road as a Cambridge assault and battery lawyer.

These sensitive cases are handled by Daniel J. Larson himself, and his credentials are on his profile. From the first call you deal directly with a lawyer who will explain, in plain terms, how a Massachusetts assault and battery claim works, who may be responsible, and what to do and avoid while the case is open.

The most important thing to understand is that a civil claim can reach beyond the attacker. Suing the person who hit you is a right, but attackers are often without insurance or assets, so a judgment against them may be worth little. The stronger path is frequently a claim against a business, landlord, or property owner whose failure to provide reasonable security, adequate lighting, working locks, staffing, or crowd control, allowed a foreseeable attack to happen. That claim reaches insurance, and it is often where a real recovery lies.

None of that is what the injured person feels in the moment. They feel the pain, the fear, and the sense that no one is looking out for them. The job of turning an attack into a fully documented, fairly valued civil claim, and of finding the party whose neglect enabled it, is exactly what a lawyer is for, and why early advice matters so much.

One costly misunderstanding is that the criminal case is the only recourse. It is not. The civil claim is entirely separate, has a lower burden of proof, and can proceed whether or not the attacker is ever charged or convicted. A victim does not have to wait for, or depend on, the outcome of a prosecution to pursue full compensation.

Another misunderstanding is that a claim is only about the attacker. In practice, the question that often matters most is whether someone else, a bar that overserved and failed to intervene, an apartment complex with broken locks, a parking garage with no lighting or cameras, created the conditions that made the attack foreseeable. Identifying that party, and the insurance behind them, is central to a full recovery.

It also helps to understand the sources of recovery available. There is the claim against the attacker, the claim against a negligent third party whose security failed, and, for immediate needs, a state fund that compensates victims of violent crime. Knowing which of these applies, and pursuing each one that does, is a large part of the work.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
Assault & Battery Lawyer Brookline assault and battery lawyer

The attacker has nothing. We look further.

$300K+ Won For Clients

100+ 5-Star Google Reviews

8+ Years of Legal Expertise

98% Legal Success Rate

100+ Injured Victims Helped

No Win, No Fee Guaranteed

How Massachusetts law handles an assault and battery

A civil assault and battery claim runs separately from the criminal case, with its own lower burden of proof, and it can reach both the attacker and, importantly, any third party whose negligence made the attack possible. The provisions below frame how these claims work and what they can recover.

The criminal act and your separate civil claim

Under G.L. c. 265, § 13A, assault and battery is a crime, with enhanced penalties where it causes serious bodily injury, meaning permanent disfigurement, the loss or impairment of a bodily function or organ, or a substantial risk of death. This matters because, while the criminal case punishes the offender, it does not compensate you; your civil claim is separate, has a lower burden of proof, and can proceed regardless of whether the attacker is charged or convicted.

When a property owner’s neglect enabled the attack

A business or property owner has a duty to take reasonable steps to protect people from foreseeable harm, and when a failure of security allows an attack, that owner can be liable in negligence. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, comparative negligence governs such a claim, letting you recover as long as you were not more than half at fault. This matters because the claim against a negligent bar, landlord, or property owner reaches liability insurance and is frequently where the real recovery lies.

Compensation for victims of violent crime

Under G.L. c. 258C, § 3, Massachusetts operates a victim-compensation program that can pay up to $25,000, or up to $50,000 for a catastrophic injury, toward a violent-crime victim’s medical care, mental-health counseling, and lost earnings. This matters because it provides a source of immediate help that is separate from any civil claim, and pursuing it does not prevent you from also recovering from the attacker or a negligent third party.

Finally, timing is fixed by statute. Under G.L. c. 260, § 2A, a civil claim for assault and battery generally must be brought within three years, and the victim-compensation program has its own, shorter deadlines. Because the evidence that proves a claim, the security records, the camera footage, the incident and police reports, and the witness accounts, fades quickly, a careful accounting of every present and future cost should begin early.

These rules work together, and knowing how to use them is much of the value a lawyer adds. The criminal statute defines the wrong but does not pay you; the negligence path reaches a third party’s insurance when a security failure enabled the attack; the victim-compensation fund provides immediate help; and the deadline protects the whole claim. A serious assault case is won by pursuing every available source of recovery while the evidence is still there to gather.

It is also worth understanding how much the proof of a security failure drives the third-party claim, because that is often where the value is. Whether the attack was foreseeable, what security a reasonable owner would have provided, and how its absence allowed the harm are established through the property’s history, prior incidents, the camera and staffing records, and expert testimony. Building that record is central to reaching the insurance behind a negligent owner.

Where Charlestown assaults happen

Assaults in a neighborhood like Charlestown cluster where people gather, drink, and move at night. The bars and restaurants along the Warren Street corridor and near City Square, the streets and parking areas around them at closing time, the common areas and entrances of apartment buildings, and the darker stretches near the waterfront and the transit stations all present the conditions in which attacks happen, and in which a property owner’s security, or lack of it, often makes the difference.

The setting shapes both the claim and the responsible party. An assault inside or just outside a bar may involve an establishment that overserved a patron or failed to intervene or provide security; an attack in an apartment building may involve a landlord with broken locks or no lighting; and an assault in a parking area or garage may involve an owner who provided no cameras, lighting, or patrols. Identifying that third party, and the insurance behind them, is part of building the fullest possible recovery, and it directly affects the income a serious injury costs you while you cannot work.

The circumstances of the attack also point toward the proof. A bar fight, an attack by an intruder in a building, and an assault in an unsecured lot each raise different questions about what security was owed and whether the attack was foreseeable. Matching the investigation to how the attack actually happened, and to the history of the place where it occurred, is what separates a claim paid fairly from one an insurer resolves for far less.

What the security record proves

In a third-party assault claim the property’s own record often decides the case. The security-camera footage, the incident and police reports, the staffing and lighting records, and any history of prior attacks at the location together establish whether the harm was foreseeable and whether the owner did what a reasonable owner should have. Securing that record early, before footage is overwritten and memories fade, is frequently what proves the negligence and reaches the insurance behind it.

The neighborhood’s patterns also concentrate certain kinds of attacks. The nightlife areas produce closing-time and overservice assaults; the residential buildings produce intruder and common-area attacks; and the unlit lots and transit approaches produce opportunistic ones. Reading which pattern an attack fits helps identify the responsible party, the security that was owed, and the evidence that will decide the claim.

Even a single record can anchor a disputed Charlestown assault claim: a security camera, an incident report, or evidence of prior attacks at the same location can establish that the harm was foreseeable and that the owner failed to prevent it. Because that evidence is so easily lost, moving quickly to preserve it is one of the most valuable steps a victim can take.

What an assault can cost you

A serious assault reaches far past the first emergency visit. A full claim accounts for the medical and surgical care the injuries require, the mental-health counseling that trauma so often demands, the income lost while you cannot work, and the pain, fear, and lasting trauma the attack leaves behind. Because these claims have no no-fault benefits behind them, the wages a long recovery costs and every other loss must come from the attacker, a negligent third party, or the victim fund, and a full and careful accounting of everything you are owed is exactly what an insurer works hardest to minimize.

The stakes are highest with the injuries a violent attack can cause, serious fractures, stab or gunshot wounds, a head injury, or the deep and lasting psychological trauma that can follow. In those cases the gap between an insurer’s first offer and what the injury will actually cost, in future treatment, counseling, and lost earning power, can be enormous, and proving that full value takes the medical and mental-health record, the treating providers, and often expert testimony. That work is what keeps a life-altering injury from being settled for a fraction of its worth.

None of this is something a victim should manage alone while trying to recover. A free, private conversation can explain what your claim may involve, who may be responsible, and what your situation may be worth, so your decisions are informed rather than rushed. Because these cases are handled on a contingency fee, that guidance comes with no upfront cost.

Facing a property owner’s insurer alone is not a fair contest. Its adjusters defend these claims regularly and are practiced at blaming the victim, denying that the attack was foreseeable, making an early low offer, and letting the security footage disappear. A lawyer who preserves the evidence, proves the security failure, and pursues every source of recovery is what levels the field, and where an assault proves fatal, we can explain what the loss entitles a family to recover.

The value of documenting the full harm cannot be overstated, because in an assault case the emotional injury is often as serious as the physical one. Whether the trauma will require long-term counseling, how it affects work and daily life, and what lasting psychological harm is worth all turn on the treating and examining providers. Making sure that record is complete, and answering an insurer that treats emotional injury as an afterthought, is central to protecting the claim.

Acting early protects the whole case. The sooner the injuries, physical and emotional, are documented, the sooner the security evidence is preserved, and the sooner a lawyer can identify every responsible party and keep the insurer from locking in a low number, the better the outcome tends to be. For a serious attack with lasting effects, that early, informed handling is often what secures the full, long-term value the case holds, and it costs nothing to start.

Because an assault can create claims against the attacker, a negligent property owner, and the victim-compensation fund at once, pursuing each source together is essential to a full recovery. We identify and coordinate every one of them, because a serious injury should not be limited to whatever single, often empty-handed, source is easiest to name.

It also helps to understand how a civil case and a criminal case can move in parallel. A criminal conviction is not required for a civil recovery, but where one exists it can help prove the underlying attack, and a criminal restitution order, though usually limited, does not bar the far fuller compensation a civil claim provides. We coordinate the two so that the criminal process supports, rather than replaces, your right to be made whole.

There is also a dignity in these cases that goes beyond the money. Holding a careless business or landlord accountable for a preventable attack can force safer lighting, working locks, and real security, so the next person who walks through that door or across that lot is protected. Part of our work is to build the record that makes that accountability, and that change, possible.

Emergency and Ongoing Medical Care

Counseling and Mental Health

Lost Income and Earning Capacity

Pain, Trauma, and Disability

Three steps to protect your assault claim

Get medical care and report it fast

Get treated for the physical injuries and tell your providers about the emotional effects too, and report the attack to police so there's an official record. Note anyone who witnessed the whole thing.

Preserve the site security evidence

Security footage is often overwritten within days, so it is urgent to identify the business or building and its cameras, and note the location's security, or lack of it. Give no statement to insurers.

Get a civil lawyer, not just police

A criminal case will not compensate you, and the party who can, a negligent owner, may let this evidence vanish, so before you rely on the prosecution or accept any offer, get a free review right now.

Talk to a Charlestown assault and battery lawyer before you settle

If you were attacked in Charlestown, remember that the criminal case punishes your attacker but does not compensate you, and that a business or property owner whose neglect enabled the attack may be responsible. Talk with our team, or with our Boston personal injury attorney office, for a free and private review of who is responsible and what your claim may be worth, and let us preserve the evidence and handle the insurer while you focus on recovering.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Our Practice Areas.

Larson Law helps injured people and families across Massachusetts after a serious accident. If you were hurt by someone else’s carelessness in Boston, we are ready to listen and explain your options at no cost.

Charlestown assault and battery questions, answered

Will the criminal case get me compensation?

Usually not. A criminal case is brought by the Commonwealth to punish the offender, and even a conviction rarely puts money in the victim’s hands beyond limited restitution. A separate civil claim, with a lower burden of proof, is how a victim actually recovers for medical costs, lost income, and pain and trauma.

Yes. A civil claim is completely separate from the criminal case and does not depend on it. It has a lower burden of proof and can proceed whether or not the attacker is ever charged or convicted, so you do not have to wait for or rely on a prosecution to pursue compensation.

Often, yes, and this is where these cases turn. Attackers are frequently without insurance or assets, so the stronger claim is usually against a business or property owner whose failure to provide reasonable security allowed the attack. That claim reaches liability insurance and is often where a real recovery lies.

It is a claim that a business or property owner failed to take reasonable steps, adequate lighting, working locks, cameras, staffing, or crowd control, to protect people from a foreseeable attack. When that failure allows an assault to happen, the owner can be held responsible in negligence, separately from the attacker.

Massachusetts runs a program that can pay a violent-crime victim up to $25,000, or up to $50,000 for a catastrophic injury, toward medical care, mental-health counseling, and lost earnings. It provides immediate help separate from any lawsuit, and using it does not prevent you from also recovering from a negligent party.

A civil assault and battery claim generally must be brought within three years, and the victim-compensation program has its own, shorter deadlines. Because security footage and other evidence disappear quickly, the practical deadline for preserving proof is far sooner, so acting promptly is important.

Possibly the establishment, in addition to the attacker. A bar that overserved a patron, ignored a brewing conflict, or failed to provide adequate security can be liable when that failure leads to an assault. The bar’s security footage and its history of incidents are often central to proving the claim.

Yes. The psychological harm from an attack, the fear, anxiety, sleeplessness, and lasting trauma, is a real and compensable injury, sometimes the most serious one. Documenting it through counseling and treatment records is essential, because insurers often try to treat emotional injury as an afterthought.

You may. A landlord who failed to maintain working locks, secure entrances, adequate lighting, or other reasonable safety measures can be responsible when that failure allows an intruder to attack a resident or visitor. The building’s security history and maintenance records help establish whether the attack was foreseeable.

It depends on the severity of your physical and emotional injuries and on who is responsible, not on an insurer’s first offer. A fair value accounts for medical care, counseling, lost income and earning power, and the pain and trauma the attack caused. A claim reaching a negligent owner’s insurance can carry substantial value.

For a serious attack, it helps a great deal. Finding the responsible party beyond the attacker, proving a security failure, preserving footage that disappears within days, and coordinating a civil claim with the victim fund are specialized tasks. Your own advocate pursues every source of recovery while you focus on recovering.

Nothing upfront. These cases are handled on a contingency fee, so you owe no attorney fee unless we recover for you, and the first consultation is free. That lets you pursue the full value of your claim, and reach the party whose neglect enabled the attack, without any financial risk of your own.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.