CHARLESTOWN PRODUCT LIABILITY LAWYER
The product failed.
You should not pay for it.
When a defective product injures you, Massachusetts law doesn’t make you prove the maker was careless, only that the product failed. Larson Law proves it and pursues the full cost.
- No fee unless we win
- Same-day response
- Free case review
As Seen On:
What a Charlestown product liability claim involves
We trust the products around us, the tools we work with, the appliances in our homes, the vehicles we drive, the medical devices we depend on, to be reasonably safe. When one of them fails, the results can be severe: a power tool that shatters, a heater that catches fire, a machine that lacks a guard, a device that malfunctions. A product liability claim is about holding the companies that designed, made, and sold that product responsible for the harm it caused, and Massachusetts gives an injured person a strong path to do exactly that.
That is where these cases turn. Getting full compensation after a product injury, the medical care, the lost income, and the pain and lasting disability a serious failure causes, takes fast work to preserve the product and a firm claim against every company in the chain that put it in your hands. Our firm does that work, the same way we handle the wider Boston personal injury attorney practice, through our Boston product liability lawyer team, and just up the road as a Cambridge product liability lawyer.
Defect cases here are directed by Daniel J. Larson, and you can read his background on his profile. From the first call you deal directly with a lawyer who will explain, in plain terms, how a Massachusetts product claim works, who can be held responsible, and what to do and avoid while the case is open.
Massachusetts approaches these cases differently from many states, and the difference favors the injured person. Rather than a separate rule of strict tort liability, Massachusetts uses the implied warranty of merchantability, which courts have said works much like strict liability: a product must be fit for its ordinary use, and if it is not, and it injures someone, the maker and seller are responsible, without any need to prove they were careless. That places a defective-product victim on strong footing from the start.
None of that is what the injured person feels in the moment. They feel the pain, the shock that something they trusted caused it, and the worry about bills and lost work. The job of turning a product failure into a fully documented, fairly valued claim, and of proving the defect, is exactly what a lawyer is for, and why early advice matters so much.
One costly misunderstanding is that you cannot sue a manufacturer you never dealt with directly. In Massachusetts you can. The law removes the old requirement that you bought the product from the company you are suing, so a manufacturer, a distributor, and a retailer can each be held responsible to anyone they should have expected to use or be affected by the product. That reach is central to a full recovery.
Another misunderstanding is that these cases are about argument rather than proof. In practice they turn on the product itself: what the defect was, whether it was a design flaw, a manufacturing error, or a missing warning, and how it caused the injury. Preserving the actual product, unaltered, is often the single most important step, because it is the key piece of evidence, and once it is repaired or discarded the case becomes far harder to prove.
It also helps to understand the kinds of defects the law recognizes. A design defect makes an entire product line unsafe; a manufacturing defect makes a particular unit dangerous; and a failure to warn leaves users unaware of a hidden risk. Identifying which kind of defect caused the injury shapes the evidence, the experts, and the companies that will be held responsible.
You should not have to prove they were careless.
- We preserve the defective product itself, the single most important evidence, before it can be repaired, discarded, or altered.
- We use Massachusetts’s warranty law, which works much like strict liability, so you need not prove the maker was careless.
- We pursue every company in the chain, the manufacturer, the distributor, and the seller, and the enhanced damages Chapter 93A allows.
- We work with engineering and safety experts to establish the defect and how it caused your injury.
- We deal with the companies and their insurers, so you are not fighting them while you heal.
- No fee unless we win
- Free, private case review
- Same-day response
- Honest advice from day one
$300K+ Won For Clients
100+ 5-Star Google Reviews
8+ Years of Legal Expertise
98% Legal Success Rate
100+ Injured Victims Helped
No Win, No Fee Guaranteed
How Massachusetts law handles a defective product
Massachusetts product liability rests mainly on the implied warranty of merchantability, which the courts treat as close to strict liability, and it is reinforced by negligence principles and by the Commonwealth’s strong consumer-protection statute. The sections below set out the core of a defective-product claim.
The implied warranty a product must meet
Under G.L. c. 106, § 2-314, every product sold by a merchant carries an implied warranty that it is merchantable, meaning, among other things, that it is fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. This matters because it means a product that injures someone during normal use has breached that warranty, and the injured person does not have to prove the maker was negligent, only that the product was not fit and safe.
You can sue the maker even if you did not buy it
Under G.L. c. 106, § 2-318, lack of privity is no defense: a manufacturer, seller, lessor, or supplier is liable to anyone it might reasonably have expected to use, consume, or be affected by the product, and a claim must be brought within three years of the injury. This matters because it lets an injured person reach the manufacturer directly, even a bystander who never bought the product, and it sets the deadline that protects the claim.
Unfair conduct and enhanced damages
Under G.L. c. 93A, § 9, Massachusetts’s consumer-protection law lets a person injured by an unfair or deceptive practice recover actual damages, attorney’s fees, and, where a violation was willful or knowing, double or treble damages. This matters because a manufacturer that hid a known defect or ignored a safety problem can face enhanced damages, which both compensates the victim more fully and holds bad conduct to account.
Sharing some blame does not end your claim
Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, Massachusetts comparative negligence lets you recover as long as you were not more than half at fault, with any award reduced by your share. This matters because manufacturers routinely argue that the user misused the product, and answering that with the evidence of the defect, and of how the product was actually used, is frequently the difference between a full recovery and a discounted one.
These rules work together to make a Massachusetts product claim strong. The implied warranty establishes responsibility without a fight over the maker’s carefulness; the removal of the privity requirement lets the claim reach every company in the chain; the consumer-protection statute adds the threat of enhanced damages for hidden or ignored defects; and comparative fault limits only a genuine misuse defense. A serious product case is won by preserving the product, proving the defect with the right experts, and reaching every responsible company.
It is also worth understanding how much the physical evidence drives these cases, because the product is the proof. Whether the failure was a design flaw, a manufacturing error, or a missing warning is established through the product itself, its history, and expert analysis. Preserving the item unaltered, and documenting how it was used and how it failed, is central to proving the defect and securing the full value of the claim.
Where Charlestown product injuries happen
Product injuries do not belong to any one street the way a crash or a fall does, but they touch every part of life in a neighborhood like Charlestown. They happen in homes, when an appliance, a heater, or a household product fails; on the job, when a tool, a machine, or safety equipment does not perform as it should; on the road, when a vehicle or a component is defective; and in the care of patients, when a medical device or a drug causes harm. What ties them together is a product that was supposed to be safe and was not.
The setting shapes the claim and the evidence. A workplace product injury may involve both a workers’ compensation claim and a separate claim against the equipment maker; a home product failure may involve the manufacturer and the retailer that sold it; and a vehicle defect may involve a national manufacturer and a recall history. Recognizing every responsible company, and preserving the product, is part of building the fullest possible recovery, and it directly affects the income a serious injury costs you while you cannot work.
The kind of defect also points toward the proof and the experts. A design defect that makes a whole product line unsafe, a manufacturing defect in a single unit, and a failure to warn of a hidden danger each call for different evidence and different specialists. Matching the investigation to the kind of failure is what separates a claim paid fairly from one a manufacturer resolves for far less, and it is why early, expert-guided handling matters.
What the product proves
In a product case the item itself is the most important evidence. The product, kept unaltered, its labeling and instructions, its maintenance and purchase history, any recall notices, and expert analysis of how it failed together establish the defect and how it caused the injury. Securing the product early, before it is repaired, returned, or thrown away, is frequently what makes the difference between a provable claim and one that cannot be proven at all.
The variety of products also means a variety of injuries. Defective tools and machines cause crush, laceration, and amputation injuries; failing appliances and heaters cause burns and fires; defective vehicles and parts cause crash injuries; and unsafe medical devices and drugs cause their own serious harms. Reading which kind of product and defect is involved helps identify the responsible companies, the experts, and the evidence that will decide the claim.
Even a single piece of proof can anchor a disputed Charlestown product claim: the preserved product, a recall notice for the same model, or an expert’s analysis of the failure can establish a defect the manufacturer would otherwise deny. Because that evidence, above all the product itself, is so easily lost, moving quickly to preserve it is the most valuable step an injured person can take.
What a defective product can cost you
A serious product injury reaches far past the first hospital visit. A full claim accounts for the emergency and corrective care, the surgery and rehabilitation a serious injury can require, the income lost while you cannot work, and the pain and lasting disability the failure caused. Because a product claim has no no-fault benefits behind it, the wages a long recovery costs and every other loss must come from the responsible companies, and a full and careful accounting of everything you are owed, potentially enlarged by enhanced damages, is exactly what a manufacturer’s insurer works hardest to minimize.
The stakes are highest with the injuries defective products so often cause, burns, amputations, crush injuries, and the harms of a failed medical device or drug. In those cases the gap between an insurer’s first offer and what the injury will actually cost, in future treatment and lost earning power, can be enormous, and proving that full value takes the medical record, the treating physicians, engineering experts, and often an economist. That work is what keeps a life-altering injury from being settled for a fraction of its worth.
None of this is something an injured person should manage alone while trying to heal. A free, private conversation can explain what your claim may involve, which companies are responsible, and what the case may be worth, so your decisions are informed rather than rushed. Because these cases are handled on a contingency fee, that guidance comes with no upfront cost.
Facing a manufacturer alone is not a fair contest. These companies and their insurers defend product claims constantly and are practiced at blaming the user for misuse, disputing the defect, making an early low offer, and running out the clock while the product is lost. A lawyer who preserves the evidence, proves the defect, and pursues every company and every remedy, including the enhanced damages the consumer-protection law allows, is what levels the field, and where a product failure proves fatal, we can explain what the loss entitles a family to recover.
The value of getting the proof right cannot be overstated, because in a product case the defect and the injury together drive the claim. Whether the failure was a design flaw, a manufacturing error, or a missing warning, and how the injury will affect the person’s life, all turn on the physical evidence, the medical record, and the experts. Making sure that proof is complete, and answering a manufacturer’s experts who try to minimize the defect or the harm, is central to protecting the claim.
Acting early protects the whole case. The sooner the product is preserved, the sooner the injury is documented, and the sooner a lawyer can identify every responsible company and keep the insurer from locking in a low number, the better the outcome tends to be. For a serious injury with lasting effects, that early, informed handling is often what secures the full, long-term value the case holds, and it costs nothing to start.
Because a defective product usually passes through several hands, a manufacturer, a distributor, and a retailer, more than one company and more than one policy may be responsible, and reaching each can be the difference between a limited and a full recovery. We identify every company in the chain, because a serious injury should not be limited to whichever single defendant is easiest to name.
There is also a broader value in these cases that the checkbook alone does not capture. A claim that forces a hidden defect into the open can push a dangerous product toward a recall or a redesign, so that what happened to you does not happen to the next family, and part of what we do is build the record and apply the pressure that makes that kind of change possible.
Emergency and Corrective Care
Lost Income and Earning Capacity
Pain, Suffering, and Disability
Chapter 93A Enhanced Damages
Three steps to protect your product injury claim
Get medical care and keep this item
Get treated right away and, just as important, keep the product exactly as it is; do not repair, alter, wash, return, or throw it away, because it is the single key evidence in your injury claim here.
Note exactly how the product failed
Write down how you were using the product and how it failed while it stays fresh, note any witnesses, and check for recall notices on the model. Give no recorded statement to the maker or its insurer.
Call a lawyer before you discard it
Product cases turn on evidence that is easily lost and on experts who must examine the product, so before you sign anything or let it be discarded, a free review preserves the claim right now for you.
- 5.0 stars out of 100+ reviews
Talk to a Charlestown product liability lawyer before you settle
If a defective product injured you in Charlestown, the most important thing is to preserve the product itself, and to know that Massachusetts law lets you hold the maker responsible without proving it was careless. Talk with our team, or with our Boston personal injury attorney office, for a free and private review of who is responsible and what your claim may be worth, and let us preserve the evidence and handle the companies while you focus on getting better.
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.
Our Clients.
Our Practice Areas.
Larson Law helps injured people and families across Massachusetts after a serious accident. If you were hurt by someone else’s carelessness in Boston, we are ready to listen and explain your options at no cost.
Charlestown product liability questions, answered
Do I have to prove the maker was careless?
No. Massachusetts relies on the implied warranty of merchantability, which the courts treat much like strict liability. You need to show the product was not fit and safe for its ordinary use and that it injured you, not that the manufacturer was negligent, which puts a defective-product claim on strong footing.
Can I sue a manufacturer I never bought from?
Yes. Massachusetts removed the old requirement that you bought the product from the company you are suing. A manufacturer, distributor, seller, or supplier can be held responsible to anyone it should have expected to use or be affected by the product, including a bystander who never purchased it.
Why is keeping the product so important?
Because the product is the single most important piece of evidence. Whether the defect was in the design, the manufacturing, or a missing warning is proven through the item itself and expert analysis. If it is repaired, returned, or discarded, the case becomes far harder, and sometimes impossible, to prove.
What kinds of defects can support a claim?
Three main kinds. A design defect makes an entire product line unsafe; a manufacturing defect makes a particular unit dangerous; and a failure to warn leaves users unaware of a hidden risk. Identifying which kind caused your injury shapes the evidence, the experts, and the companies that will be held responsible.
How long do I have to bring a product liability claim?
A product claim generally must be brought within three years of the injury. But the practical deadline is often sooner, because the product itself can be lost or altered within days or weeks, so preserving it and getting advice early is essential to protecting the claim.
What is Chapter 93A and how does it help?
Chapter 93A is Massachusetts’s consumer-protection law. Where a company’s conduct was unfair or deceptive, such as hiding a known defect, it allows recovery of attorney’s fees and, for a willful or knowing violation, double or treble damages. That can significantly increase a recovery and hold bad corporate conduct to account.
I was hurt by a product at work. Do I have extra options?
Often, yes. A workplace product injury can support both a workers’ compensation claim and a separate claim against the maker of the defective tool, machine, or equipment. That third-party product claim can recover damages, including pain and suffering, that comp alone does not pay.
The company says I misused the product. Does that end my claim?
Not necessarily. Manufacturers routinely claim misuse to avoid responsibility, but the question is how the product was actually used and whether the defect caused the injury. Comparative negligence may reduce a recovery for genuine misuse, but it rarely bars a claim, and the evidence of the defect answers the argument.
What if there was a recall on the product?
A recall can be powerful evidence that the product was defective and that the manufacturer knew of the danger. It does not automatically win the case, but it supports the claim and can bear on enhanced damages under the consumer-protection law. We check for recall history on the model as part of building the case.
What is my product liability claim worth?
It depends on the severity and permanence of your injury and the conduct of the companies involved, not on an insurer’s first offer. A fair value accounts for medical care and future treatment, lost income and earning power, pain and disability, and, where warranted, enhanced damages under Chapter 93A.
Do I need a lawyer for a product liability claim?
For a serious injury, almost always. Preserving the product, proving the defect with engineering experts, reaching every company in the chain, and using the consumer-protection law are specialized tasks, and manufacturers defend these claims aggressively. Your own advocate preserves the proof, proves the defect, and lets you focus on healing.
What does hiring you cost?
Nothing upfront. These cases are handled on a contingency fee, so you owe no attorney fee unless we recover for you, and the first consultation is free. That lets you take on a manufacturer and pursue the full value of your claim, including any enhanced damages, without any financial risk of your own.
Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.