boston personal injury lawyer

CHARLESTOWN DOG BITE LAWYER

A dog bite scar can be part of your claim.

A bite wound may close quickly, but the scar it leaves can need plastic surgery later. A claim may account for that later care, not only the first treatment.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBC News Boston logo

A Charlestown dog bite lawyer works on the injury, not the dog.

A dog bite does more damage than the surface shows. Teeth crush as well as cut, so a wound that looks small on the skin can carry torn nerves and tendons underneath it, and bacteria from a dog’s mouth sits deep in tissue where it is hard to reach. That is why a bite that seemed minor on the day can turn into weeks of treatment. Scarring is the part that stays. For a child it is often the fear that stays with it, and a parent watching that happen is dealing with something no dressing covers.

Massachusetts does not ask a bitten person to prove the dog was vicious or that it had bitten anyone before. The owner answers for what the animal did. That single point changes the whole shape of the case, because you are not gathering evidence about the dog’s past and you are not arguing about whether the owner was careless. The argument is about your injury and about who pays for it, which is a far stronger place to start from than most injury claims ever get.

What full value covers is wider than the emergency room visit. It takes in the reconstructive work a scar may need later, the counseling a frightened child may need for longer than anyone expects, the income lost while you are unable to work, and the pain, scarring and distress a serious bite leaves you carrying. Reaching that figure takes an early claim, put together carefully, and a firm answer to an owner who insists the dog is friendly or that the victim brought it on.

Bite cases here are handled personally by Daniel J. Larson, whose background is set out on his profile. From the first call you deal with a lawyer directly, who will explain in plain terms how the claim works, who is responsible, and what to do and what to avoid while it is open.

None of that is what the injured person feels in the moment. They feel the pain, the fear, and for a parent the distress of a child who was bitten. Turning that into a documented, fairly valued claim, and reaching the insurance that will pay it, is the work a lawyer is there to do, and it is why early advice matters so much.

One costly misunderstanding is that a claim means going after someone personally. In almost every case it does not. The payment comes from insurance on the home, from renter cover, or from a landlord’s policy, not from anyone’s savings, so a fair claim rarely means taking money out of a household. Where the dog was loose in a rented building or a shared yard, more than one policy can be on the hook at once.

Another is that an owner saying the victim provoked the dog ends the matter. It rarely does. The narrow exceptions, for trespassing or for genuinely tormenting the animal, have to be proved by the owner, and where a young child was bitten that argument almost never holds. An owner who reaches for it is doing exactly what a lawyer is there to answer.

It also helps to see how a bite claim is built. Responsibility is settled by the rule above. Value is settled by the medical record and, where scarring is involved, by what a plastic surgeon says about how permanent it is. Payment comes from whichever policies apply. Finding every responsible party and every policy early is often what decides whether a serious bite is paid in full, and the same approach runs through the rest of our injury work.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
Brockton Dog Bite Accident New Bedford dog bite lawyer new bedford dog bite lawyer

You will not be the one arguing with the owner.

The law starts by holding the dog's owner responsible.

Massachusetts starts from a position that favors the bitten person. The question is whether the dog caused the harm, not whether the owner did anything careless, and the few ways out of that belong to the owner to prove rather than to you to disprove. Everything below follows from that one starting point.

The owner, or whoever had charge of the dog at the time, answers for the damage it did. You are not required to show the dog had a history, that it had snapped at anyone before, or that the owner had been warned. That single difference removes the argument most injury claims are lost on, and it is why a bite case sits on firmer ground than a road or fall case ever does. Owners are often surprised by this themselves, and so are the people around them, which is part of why a bitten person is so often talked out of making a claim at all.

There are only two real exceptions, and both sit with the owner to establish. One is where the injured person had no right to be there. The other is where the person was hurting or tormenting the animal at the time. Neither is easy to prove, and where a young child was bitten the law does not expect a child that age to have done either, so the argument rarely survives contact with the facts.

Payment almost never comes out of anyone’s savings. It comes from insurance on the home, from a renter policy, or from a landlord’s cover where the building owner knew a dangerous dog was living there. That last one matters more than people expect, because it can open a second policy in a case where the dog’s owner has little or nothing behind them. A dog that has already worried other residents leaves a trail, and that trail is worth finding before anyone has reason to tidy it away.

An owner will often say the victim riled the dog up. Said early enough and left unanswered, that can reduce what is paid, but it only bites inside the narrow exceptions above. Answering it with the actual circumstances of the bite, while the details are still fresh and the witnesses still reachable, is frequently the difference between a claim paid in full and a claim paid at a discount.

There is also a deadline. A bite claim generally has to be brought within three years, and a claim made for an injured child carries protections a lawyer can explain. The deadline is rarely the real pressure, though. The evidence ages far faster than the clock does. Photographs of the wound before it closes, the animal control record, the treating notes and the accounts of anyone who saw it are all easier to secure in the first weeks than in the second year. None of that record gathers itself, and an insurer has no reason to gather it for you.

Most of the value, in the end, rests on medical proof, because scarring and how permanent it is sit at the heart of a serious bite claim. Whether a scar can be improved by surgery, how a facial injury will affect a child as they grow, and what lasting nerve damage is worth all turn on the treating doctors and, very often, on a plastic surgeon’s opinion. Building that record properly, alongside a careful accounting of every present and future cost, is what secures the full value of a bite that leaves a mark.

Where the bite happened decides who has to pay.

Bites cluster in a handful of ordinary settings, and which one you were in does a lot of work in the claim. A dog on a leash in a busy street is a different case from a dog running loose in a park, and both are different again from a dog that lives in the building you were walking into. The place tells you who to look at, and it tells you which insurance is likely to pay.

Where a bite happens on open ground or on a sidewalk, the trail usually runs to the owner and to the policy on their home or their rented apartment. Where it happens in or around a building someone else owns, a landlord can be answerable too, if they knew a dangerous dog was living on the property and let it stay. That second route is worth checking in every case, because it can be the difference between one policy and two, and it is the one most often missed when a bitten person deals with an insurer alone.

The circumstances point toward the proof as well as the payer. A leashed dog lunging on a crowded sidewalk, a loose dog in an open space, a resident’s dog in a shared hallway, and a dog that goes for someone delivering to a door each raise their own questions about who was in charge and what was already known. A case built to match how the bite actually happened holds up. A case built on a general account of a dog biting someone does not, and that is the version an insurer prefers to settle cheaply.

The record around a bite usually decides its value, and sometimes decides responsibility outright. The animal control report, the licensing and any earlier complaints about the same dog, the medical notes, photographs of the wound before it starts to close, and what the people who saw it can say together establish what happened and how bad it was. Gathering that early, before wounds heal and memories blur, is often what secures the full value of a scarring injury and what answers an owner who says the dog was provoked.

Densely built areas concentrate certain kinds of bite. Shared entrances, stairwells and yards put dogs, residents and visitors in close quarters with no room to step away. Busy paths and green spaces bring loose dogs into contact with children, who are bitten higher on the body than adults and are far more likely to be marked on the face. Doorsteps account for another share, where a dog reaches someone arriving with a delivery or the mail. Reading which pattern a bite fits helps identify who is responsible, which insurance applies, and what evidence will decide it.

A single document can turn a disputed bite claim around. An animal control report, an earlier complaint about the same dog, or one clear photograph of the wound can settle both what happened and how serious it was. Because that evidence is best captured early, moving quickly is one of the most valuable things a bitten person can do, and it protects the income a serious injury costs you while you are unable to work.

A serious bite costs more than the first hospital visit.

A serious dog bite reaches far past the first emergency visit. A full claim has to account for the wound care, any surgery that follows, the reconstructive work a badly scarring bite can need years later, the counseling a frightened child may need, the income lost while the recovery runs its course, and the pain and distress the bite leaves behind. There is also no automatic pot of early cover to fall back on the way there is after a road crash. Every one of those losses has to come from the insurance standing behind the responsible owner, which is exactly the figure an insurer works hardest to keep down.

The stakes are highest with bites that leave permanent marks. A facial injury to a child, deep nerve or tendon damage to a hand, a wound that scars badly across an arm or a leg. In those cases the gap between an insurer’s first offer and what the injury will actually cost, in later surgery and in a child’s changing needs as they grow, can be enormous. Closing it takes the medical record, the treating doctors, and often a plastic surgeon. Whether a scar can be improved and what lasting damage is worth turn on that evidence, and on answering an insurer’s own doctor when they try to minimize the injury.

Facing the owner’s insurer alone is not a fair contest. The people handling these claims do it every day. They are practiced at describing the dog as friendly, at suggesting the victim provoked it, at making an early low offer while the injury still looks minor, and at taking a recorded statement that locks in that version before anyone knows how the wound will heal. A lawyer who documents the harm and refuses to move early is what levels that field.

Acting early protects the whole case. The sooner the wound is documented and the animal control file and any earlier complaints are gathered, the harder it is for an insurer to lock in a low number. Because a bite can involve both a dog owner and a landlord who knew about the danger, more than one policy may apply, and reaching each of them can be the difference between a limited payment and a complete one. A serious injury, especially to a child, should not be capped by whichever policy an insurer finds most convenient.

A bite also carries risks that unfold over time. The chance of infection, the need for a rabies assessment, and the way a child’s fear can linger long after the wound has closed all belong in the claim. None of this is something an injured person or a worried parent should manage alone. A private conversation at the start can explain what the claim involves, who is responsible, and what it may realistically be worth, and fees are taken as a share of what comes in at the end, set out in plain terms before anything is signed.

Emergency and Reconstructive Care

Scarring and Plastic Surgery

Pain, Trauma, and Counseling

Lost Income and Related Costs

What you do in the first week shapes the claim.

Get treated and report the dog bite

Get the wound treated right away, because bites carry a high risk of infection and nerve damage, and report the bite to animal control so there's an official record. Photograph the injury and the dog.

Gather the details before they fade

Get the owner's name and address, note any witnesses, and learn whether the dog has bitten before. Photograph the wound as it heals to document scarring, and give no recorded statement to any insurer.

Consult a lawyer before you sign it

A quick offer rarely accounts for scarring, a child's trauma, or surgery, and accepting it closes the claim for good, so before you sign a release, one free review shows what it is truly worth to you.

A Charlestown dog bite lawyer should see the offer first.

A bite claim is usually settled long before most people realize how much it was worth, and once it is signed it cannot be reopened. Before you agree to anything, talk to us about who is responsible, which insurance is likely to pay, and what the injury is realistically worth once the scarring and the longer term are counted. We will deal with the owner and with the insurer from that point on, so the only thing left in your hands is getting better.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Our Practice Areas.

Larson Law helps injured people and families across Massachusetts after a serious accident. If you were hurt by someone else’s carelessness in Boston, we are ready to listen and explain your options at no cost.

Most people arrive with the same few questions.

Do I have to prove the dog bit someone before?

No. Massachusetts is a strict-liability state, so the owner is responsible for the harm their dog caused whether or not the dog ever bit before. Unlike states that give a dog “one free bite,” you do not have to prove the dog was known to be dangerous, which puts your claim on strong footing.

Usually not. The law’s exceptions are narrow, for trespassing or truly teasing, tormenting, or abusing the dog, and the owner must prove them. For a child under seven, the law presumes there was no provocation at all, and the burden is on the owner to show otherwise.

Almost always insurance, not the owner personally. A homeowner or renter policy typically covers dog-bite liability, and a landlord who knew of a dangerous dog may have coverage too. That means pursuing a fair claim rarely means taking money directly from a neighbor, friend, or family member.

It can be stronger. For a child under seven, the law presumes the child did not provoke the dog, so the owner must prove otherwise. Child bites also often involve facial scarring and lasting trauma, which increase the value, and a claim brought on a child’s behalf has its own timing protections.

Scarring is often the heart of a bite claim’s value. A fair recovery accounts for reconstructive or plastic surgery, the permanence of the scar, and, for a child, how a facial injury will affect them as they grow. Documenting the wound with photographs and a plastic surgeon’s opinion is central to proving that value.

A dog-bite claim generally must be brought within three years, and a claim on behalf of an injured child has additional protections a lawyer can explain. Even so, the animal-control records, the wound photographs, and the witness accounts are best gathered early, so acting quickly strengthens the case.

Possibly more than one party. The dog’s owner is responsible under the strict-liability rule, and a landlord who knew a dangerous dog was on the property may also be responsible under ordinary negligence principles. Identifying every responsible party and each policy can be the difference between a limited and a full recovery.

Be careful. Bite injuries often involve future surgery, scarring, and, for children, lasting trauma whose full cost is not clear early, yet insurers make a fast, low offer that closes the claim for good. A free review of the offer against your actual and future losses shows whether it is anywhere near fair.

Yes. A delivery worker, postal carrier, or other visitor lawfully at a home is protected by the strict-liability rule just as anyone else is. Being at the property to do your job is not trespassing, so the owner remains responsible for a bite, and their insurance is generally the source of payment.

It depends on the severity and permanence of the injury, not on an insurer’s first offer. A fair value accounts for medical and reconstructive care, scarring, a child’s trauma and counseling, lost income, and the pain the bite causes. A disfiguring or facial injury, especially to a child, can carry substantial long-term value.

For a serious bite, it helps a great deal. Even with strict liability, valuing scarring and trauma, reaching the right insurance, and answering a provocation defense are difficult to do alone, and the insurer works to minimize the claim from the start. Your own advocate documents the injury, applies the law, and lets you focus on healing.

Nothing upfront. These cases are handled on a contingency fee, so you owe no attorney fee unless we recover for you, and the first consultation is free. That lets you pursue the full value of your claim, and hold a dog owner accountable, without any financial risk of your own.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.