boston personal injury lawyer

PRODUCT LIABILITY LAWYER LOWELL

When a product fails,
the maker must answer.

When a faulty product injures you in a Lowell home or workplace, you may not have to prove anyone was careless, so Larson Law helps you act promptly to preserve the failed product.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBC News Boston logo

What a Lowell product liability lawyer does for you.

When a product fails and injures someone, the harm is rarely the user’s fault, and Massachusetts law reflects that. The Commonwealth does not use the traditional strict tort liability that many states apply to defective products. Instead, it relies on the implied warranty of merchantability, a rule that requires products sold by a merchant to be fit for their ordinary use. In practice that warranty works as Massachusetts’ version of strict liability, because an injured person can recover without proving the maker was careless, only that the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous when it left the maker’s hands.

Defective-product cases also tend to involve more than one responsible company. The manufacturer that designed or built the product, a component maker whose part failed, and the distributor and retailer that sold it can each bear responsibility, and Massachusetts law lets an injured person reach all of them without the old privity barrier. These cases turn on evidence that has to be handled carefully, above all the product itself, which should be preserved exactly as it was rather than repaired, discarded, or returned.

A Lowell product liability lawyer can preserve the product, identify every company in the chain of sale, work with the engineers who show why it failed, and press the claim under both warranty and consumer-protection law. For related help, our team also serves clients as a Lowell personal injury lawyer and as a wider Boston personal injury attorney across the region.

Defective-product cases also tend to pit an injured individual against large national manufacturers and their insurers, who defend these claims aggressively. That imbalance is a big part of why early, organized work matters, from locking down the product to lining up the right experts before the other side can shape the story.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
Cambridge assault and battery lawyer Lowell bicycle accident lawyer Methuen personal injury lawyer Jamaica Plain personal injury lawyer South Boston personal injury lawyer Charlestown personal injury lawyer Brighton personal injury lawyer Milton personal injury lawyer Watertown personal injury lawyer Lawrence personal injury lawyer Plymouth personal injury lawyer distracted driving accident lawyer Massachusetts Massachusetts workplace accident lawyer Massachusetts explosion accident lawyer Massachusetts child injury lawyer Massachusetts bicycle accident lawyer Barnstable personal injury lawyer Chelsea personal injury lawyer Attleboro personal injury lawyer Haverhill personal injury lawyer Peabody personal injury lawyer Taunton personal injury lawyer Fall River personal injury lawyer Massachusetts hit and run accident lawyer drunk driving accident victim lawyer Massachusetts Massachusetts assault and battery civil lawsuit lawyer Framingham personal injury lawyer Brookline personal injury lawyer Weymouth personal injury lawyer Waltham personal injury lawyer Springfield personal injury lawyer Somerville personal injury lawyer Newton personal injury lawyer Massachusetts burn injury lawyer Massachusetts MBTA and bus accident lawyer Massachusetts burn injury lawyer Medford personal injury lawyer Medford personal injury lawyer Medford personal injury lawyer Malden personal injury lawyer Lynn personal injury lawyer Everett personal injury lawyer Massachusetts dog bite lawyer Massachusetts pedestrian accident lawyer Massachusetts spinal cord injury lawyer Massachusetts nursing home abuse lawyer Massachusetts product liability lawyer Massachusetts medical malpractice lawyer Massachusetts construction accident lawyer Massachusetts brain injury lawyer Massachusetts motorcycle accident lawyer Massachusetts personal injury lawyer Worcester Uber accident lawyer Worcester bicycle accident lawyer Worcester bus accident lawyer Quincy bus accident lawyer Quincy assault and battery lawyer Boston assault and battery lawyer Boston bicycle accident lawyer Boston bus accident lawyer Boston cruise ship injury lawyer Boston personal injury attorney Boston product liability lawyer | Taunton slip and fall lawyer Barnstable product liability lawyer Brighton product liability lawyer Pain and suffering settlement

Why injured Lowell product liability victims choose Larson Law.

$300K+ Won For Clients

100+ 5-Star Google Reviews

8+ Years of Legal Expertise

98% Legal Success Rate

100+ Injured Victims Helped

No Win, No Fee Guaranteed

How Massachusetts product liability law works.

Product liability in Massachusetts follows a different path from most states, and understanding that path is the key to a strong claim. The rules favor an injured user more than many people realize, but they also demand careful handling of the product and the evidence from the very start.

Massachusetts uses warranty law, not strict tort liability

Rather than the traditional strict tort liability used elsewhere, Massachusetts relies on the implied warranty of merchantability under Chapter 106, Section 2-314, which requires that goods sold by a merchant be fit for their ordinary use. A related warranty of fitness for a particular purpose applies under Chapter 106, Section 2-315 when a seller knows the buyer is relying on its judgment, and any specific promises a seller makes can create an express warranty under Chapter 106, Section 2-313. Courts treat a breach of the implied warranty as the Commonwealth’s functional equivalent of strict liability, which means an injured person can recover by showing the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous, without having to prove the maker was negligent.

You can reach everyone in the chain of sale

Massachusetts has removed the old requirement that an injured person have a direct contract with the seller. Under Chapter 106, Section 2-318, the warranty extends to anyone who could foreseeably be harmed by the product, including household members and bystanders, and reaches the manufacturer, a component maker, the distributor, and the retailer alike. Sellers sometimes try to limit or disclaim these warranties, but Chapter 106, Section 2-316 restricts how far those disclaimers can go, especially where personal injury is involved.

Consumer-protection law can add to your claim

Many defective-product cases also involve unfair or deceptive conduct, such as hiding a known hazard or making false safety claims. The consumer-protection statute, Chapter 93A, Section 2, forbids that conduct, and the remedy provision in Chapter 93A, Section 9 can allow multiple damages and attorney fees when a company acted willfully. Pursuing a warranty claim and a consumer-protection claim together can meaningfully change what a case is worth.

Fault, deadlines, and fatal cases

If a maker argues the product was misused, the modified comparative negligence rule in Chapter 231, Section 85 governs how any shared fault is weighed. The deadline to bring a personal injury claim is generally three years under Chapter 260, Section 2A, and when a defective product causes a death, close family may bring a claim under the wrongful death statute, Chapter 229, Section 2. Because the product itself is the central evidence, acting well before any deadline matters even more here than in an ordinary injury case.

Design, manufacturing, and warning defects

Defective-product claims generally fall into three groups, and identifying which one fits shapes the whole case. A design defect means the product was dangerous as intended, so every unit shares the flaw. A manufacturing defect means the design was sound but something went wrong in building this particular item. A warning defect, or failure to warn, means the product lacked adequate instructions or warnings about a hazard that was not obvious. A single case can involve more than one theory, and Massachusetts warranty law reaches all three. Pinning down the category early guides which experts are retained and what evidence is gathered.

The experts a strong product case relies on

Because these cases turn on how and why a product failed, expert analysis is usually essential. Engineers examine the item to pinpoint the defect, and specialists in fields like biomechanics, human factors, or safety standards can explain how the failure caused the injury and whether the product met industry norms. Medical experts connect the defect to the specific harm. This work is detailed and can be costly, which is one reason it helps to have a firm that advances those resources and coordinates the experts from the beginning rather than late in the case.

How a Massachusetts product claim is proven

Proving a product claim is a step-by-step process. It starts with securing the product and the records around it, moves to expert examination that identifies the defect, and builds toward showing that the defect, rather than misuse, caused the injury. Along the way the responsible companies are identified and their own documents, such as design files, testing records, and complaint histories, are sought. Each piece reinforces the others, and the earlier the process begins, the more evidence survives to support it.

What a Lowell product liability claim involves.

Larson Law handles defective-product claims for people in Lowell and across the Merrimack Valley. Product injuries do not depend on a particular street or intersection the way a crash does, but where and how the product was used still shapes the claim.

Where defective-product injuries happen in Lowell

Dangerous products injure Lowell residents in ordinary places, in the home with appliances, tools, furniture, and children’s products, on the job with machinery and equipment in the city’s warehouses and workplaces, and on the road with defective vehicle parts and tires. Lowell’s mix of dense housing, active job sites, and busy roads means the same defect can reach a homeowner, a worker, and a driver in very different settings, each of which affects what evidence exists.

Preserving the product and the evidence

The single most important step in a product case is keeping the product. It should not be repaired, thrown away, altered, or returned to the seller, because it is the physical proof of the defect. Photographs, the packaging, receipts, manuals, and any recall notices all help, and preserving the scene where an injury happened on the job or at home can matter too. Acting quickly to secure this evidence, before anyone else can change or lose it, often decides whether a defect can be proven.

Where a Lowell claim is handled

Injury claims involving Lowell residents are generally handled in the Middlesex County courts, and a defective-product case may also draw in out-of-state manufacturers and national distributors. That combination of a local claim and distant, well-funded defendants is one reason having a lawyer who can manage the engineering proof and the multiple defendants from the start is valuable.

The kinds of defective products we see in Lowell

The products that injure Lowell residents cover a wide range. We handle claims involving industrial and workplace machinery, power tools, defective auto parts and tires, household appliances that overheat or catch fire, unsafe furniture, medical devices, and dangerous children’s products and toys. Some involve a sudden failure, like a part that breaks under normal use, while others involve a slow hazard, such as a chemical exposure or a design that makes an everyday task unexpectedly dangerous. Whatever the product, the same core questions apply: what was defective, who is responsible, and how do we prove it.

Injuries a defective product can cause

Because products fail in so many ways, the injuries range widely, from burns and lacerations to crush injuries, amputations, electric shock, poisoning, and traumatic brain and spinal injuries. Some product injuries develop over time, such as harm from a defective medical device or a long chemical exposure, and those can be harder to trace back to their source without prompt investigation. Documenting the injury thoroughly and tying it to the specific product and defect is central to the claim, and it goes hand in hand with preserving the product itself.

What a Lowell product liability claim can cover.

A serious product injury can reach far beyond the first hospital visit, and the categories below are a starting point rather than a limit. Where a company’s unfair or deceptive conduct is involved, the law may allow more than ordinary damages, and every loss that applies to your situation should be identified and pursued.

Where a company knew about a danger and sold the product anyway, the consumer-protection law can push the recovery beyond ordinary damages. We look closely at what the maker knew and when, because that history can change both the value of a claim and how it is pursued.

Medical Bills and Future Care

Lost Wages and Earning Ability

Pain, Suffering, and Disability

Wrongful Death of a Loved One

What to do after an accident.

Get care and keep the exact product

See a doctor right away, even if you feel okay, since some injuries appear later, and keep every record. Prompt care creates the proof that ties your injuries to the accident, which insurers question.

Save the receipts, box, and manuals

Write down exactly how it happened and photograph the scene, the cause, and your injuries while fresh. Get names and numbers from any witnesses, since that evidence can disappear within hours or days.

Call a product liability lawyer now

Before you give the insurance company a statement or sign any release, talk with a lawyer who can protect the claim. Early advice safeguards the evidence and your deadline while you focus on recovery.

Talk to a Lowell product liability lawyer today.

Manufacturers and their insurers move quickly to control a defective-product claim, and the product that proves your case can be lost if no one preserves it. Before you deal with them, tell us what happened. We will explain how Massachusetts warranty and consumer-protection law applies, who may be responsible, and what needs to be preserved right now to protect your rights. There is no cost and no pressure, and you pay nothing unless we win your case.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Our Practice Areas.

Larson Law helps injured people and families across Massachusetts after a serious accident. If you were hurt by someone else’s carelessness in Boston, we are ready to listen and explain your options at no cost.

Lowell product liability claims, answered directly.

Does Massachusetts have strict liability for products?

Not in the traditional sense, but the result is similar. Massachusetts does not apply the strict tort liability many states use for defective products. Instead it relies on the implied warranty of merchantability under Chapter 106, Section 2-314, which the courts treat as the Commonwealth’s functional equivalent of strict liability. That means you generally do not have to prove the manufacturer was careless. You have to show the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous for its ordinary use and that the defect caused your injury. For an injured person this warranty path is often more favorable than the negligence approach used elsewhere.

In most Massachusetts product cases you do not have to prove negligence. Under the implied warranty of merchantability in Chapter 106, Section 2-314, the key questions are whether the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous for its ordinary use, and whether that defect caused your injury. Defects can arise in the product’s design, in its manufacture, or in a failure to warn about a known hazard. Proving this usually takes engineering analysis of the product itself, which is one reason preserving it matters so much. An attorney works with qualified experts to establish the defect and the link to your injury.

Because the product is the single most important piece of evidence in the case. Examining the actual item is usually how an expert shows what went wrong, whether it was a design flaw, a manufacturing error, or a missing warning. If the product is repaired, altered, thrown away, or returned to the seller, that proof can be lost, and the loss of key evidence can seriously weaken or even end a claim. Keep the product exactly as it was, along with the packaging, receipts, and manuals. Preserving it is one of the first things we help clients do.

Massachusetts law lets you reach everyone in the chain of sale. The warranty under Chapter 106, Section 2-318 reaches beyond the direct buyer, so the manufacturer, a maker of a defective component, the distributor, and the retailer can each be responsible. You do not need to have bought the product directly from the company you are claiming against. Identifying every responsible party matters because it determines which companies and insurers are available to pay the claim. An attorney can trace the chain of sale and bring in each party whose product or conduct contributed to your injury.

If a defective product injured you at work, you may have more than one claim. Workers’ compensation may cover a work injury regardless of fault, and separately a product liability claim against the manufacturer or seller of the equipment may be available, because that company is not your employer. These third-party product claims can proceed alongside a workers’ compensation claim and often provide compensation that workers’ comp does not, such as full pain and suffering. Coordinating the two properly can affect the overall recovery, and an attorney can assess which paths are open based on how the injury happened.

Yes. Massachusetts removed the old rule that required a direct contract with the seller. That protection, from Chapter 106, Section 2-318, reaches anyone who could foreseeably be harmed by the product, including family members who use it, guests, and even bystanders near it. So a person injured by a product bought by someone else, borrowed, or received as a gift can still bring a claim. What matters is that the product was defective and that it caused the injury, not who paid for it. An attorney can confirm that the law covers your specific situation.

Chapter 93A is the Massachusetts consumer-protection statute. Section 2 forbids unfair or deceptive business conduct, which in a product case can include hiding a known danger or making false safety claims. The remedy provision, Section 9, can allow multiple damages and attorney fees when a company acted willfully or knowingly. Bringing a 93A claim alongside a warranty claim can significantly increase what a case is worth and puts real pressure on a company that ignored a hazard. Whether 93A applies depends on the facts, which an attorney can evaluate.

A warning or disclaimer does not automatically defeat a claim. A warning has to actually be adequate for the hazard, and a product can still be defective in its design or manufacture despite any warning. As for disclaimers, Chapter 106, Section 2-316 limits how far a seller can go in disclaiming the implied warranty, and such limitations are especially disfavored where personal injury results. Fine print on a box or in a manual rarely ends a valid injury claim on its own. An attorney can assess whether a warning was adequate and whether any disclaimer holds up under Massachusetts law.

The general deadline for a personal injury claim is three years from the date of injury under Chapter 260, Section 2A. Product cases can involve additional timing questions, such as when a hidden defect was or should have been discovered, and a Chapter 93A claim has its own timing rules. Beyond any deadline, the practical urgency is preserving the product and the evidence before they are altered or lost. Confirming exactly which deadlines apply to your situation is something an attorney can do quickly, and it is best not to wait given how central the physical evidence is.

A recall can help your claim, but it does not replace it. A recall is evidence that the product had a recognized problem, and it can support a defect claim, but you still have to show the defect caused your injury, and a recall by itself does not pay for your losses. In some cases a company knew of the danger before the recall, which can matter under the consumer-protection statute. If you were injured by a recalled product, keep it rather than returning it, since the item remains important evidence. An attorney can use the recall as part of building the claim.

Nothing upfront. We take product liability claims on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay no attorney fee unless we win your case, and there are no upfront costs to you. That matters especially in product cases, which often require engineering experts and detailed analysis that would be out of reach if a client had to fund them. The firm advances that work and is repaid only if the claim succeeds. The first conversation is free and is a chance to understand your options before deciding anything, so there is no risk in finding out where you stand.

A claim may cover the full range of harm a defective product causes, including past and future medical care, lost wages and reduced earning ability, and the physical pain, suffering, and disability that follow a serious injury. Where a company’s conduct was unfair or deceptive under Chapter 93A, Section 9, the law may allow multiple damages and attorney fees. If a defective product causes a death, close family may bring a claim under the wrongful death statute, Chapter 229, Section 2. What your claim will support depends on the injury and the facts, which an attorney can review with you.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.