boston personal injury lawyer

BROOKLINE ASSAULT AND BATTERY LAWYER

After an attack,
the law is on your side.

After a violent attack in Brookline, you can recover from the attacker and any business that failed to protect you, and Larson Law finds the coverage and proves your claim for you.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBC News Boston logo

What a Brookline assault and battery claim involves

In the wake of a violent attack, most people’s attention turns to the criminal case, whether the person responsible will be charged and punished. That process matters, but it is aimed at punishing the offender, not at repairing your life. It does not pay your hospital bills, replace your lost wages, or answer for the fear and trauma an attack leaves behind. A civil assault and battery claim exists for exactly that purpose, and it proceeds entirely separately from any criminal case.

That separation works in an injured person’s favor. Because a civil claim uses a lower standard of proof than a criminal prosecution, you can recover compensation even if no one was ever arrested, the charges were dropped, or the attacker was found not guilty. And in many cases the person who threw the punch is not the only one responsible: when a business or property owner failed to provide reasonable security and that failure allowed the attack, that company can be liable as well, and its insurance is often what makes a real recovery possible.

Our team investigates the attack, identifies everyone responsible, and pursues the coverage that can actually pay, the same approach we bring across our Boston personal injury attorney practice, through our Boston assault and battery lawyer team, and in neighboring communities as a Cambridge assault and battery lawyer. Recovering from a violent attack is hard enough without having to fight an insurer on your own.

Every case at the firm is handled under the direction of Daniel J. Larson, whose background and credentials are on his attorney profile. From the first conversation you work directly with a lawyer who understands these cases and who will explain, in plain terms and with discretion, what your claim involves and what it may be worth.

It helps to understand that these cases usually involve two very different kinds of defendant. The first is the attacker, who is directly at fault but who frequently has no insurance and little to collect. The second is a negligent business or property owner, a bar that let a dangerous situation build, an apartment complex with broken locks and dark hallways, a venue that ignored a known risk, whose failure helped the attack happen and whose insurance can actually compensate you.

For the person who was attacked, none of that structure is what they feel afterward. They feel the injury, the fear, and often a lasting sense of vulnerability. The work of turning that experience into a claim, of finding the parties and the coverage that can make them whole, and of doing so with care for what they have been through, is exactly what a lawyer is for, and it is why reaching out early matters.

One of the hardest parts of recovering from an assault is the feeling that nothing can be done once the criminal case ends or stalls. People are told the charges were dropped, the offender received probation, or no suspect was ever found, and they conclude that is the end of it. It is not. The civil system runs on a separate track, with its own lower burden of proof, and it exists precisely to give an injured person a remedy the criminal courts do not provide.

Seeing the two systems as separate opens up options a victim may not know they have. A criminal court can punish an offender but rarely makes the injured person financially whole; a civil claim can reach the money, from the attacker, and far more often from a negligent business, that actually pays for treatment, lost income, and the lasting effects of the attack. Pursuing that claim is not about revenge; it is about recovering what the attack took from you.

We handle these matters with the seriousness and the discretion they call for. We investigate quickly, before evidence disappears, we identify everyone who bears responsibility, and we pursue the coverage that can make a genuine difference, all while treating what you have been through with care. A violent attack is a profound violation, and the response should be a claim built to hold the responsible parties fully to account.

There is also value beyond the individual case. When a business is made to answer for a foreseeable assault, it gains a concrete reason to fix the lighting, repair the locks, and hire the security that was missing, so the next person is safer. Pursuing a claim is both a personal recovery and a push for safer places in the community.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
Assault & Battery Lawyer Brookline assault and battery lawyer

Why assault victims trust us with these cases

$300K+ Won For Clients

100+ 5-Star Google Reviews

8+ Years of Legal Expertise

98% Legal Success Rate

100+ Injured Victims Helped

No Win, No Fee Guaranteed

How you recover after an assault in Massachusetts

A civil claim, separate from any charges

In Massachusetts an assault and battery is both a crime and a civil wrong. The criminal offense is defined in G.L. c. 265, § 13A, which also sets out the “serious bodily injury” that marks the gravest attacks, but the criminal case belongs to the state and is meant to punish, not to compensate you. Your civil claim is your own: it seeks money for your losses, uses a lower burden of proof, and can succeed even where there is no arrest, no charge, or an acquittal. This matters because it means your recovery never depends on the outcome of the criminal system.

Holding a negligent business to account

Frequently the defendant who can actually pay is not the attacker but a property owner or business that failed to keep people reasonably safe. A bar that over-served an aggressive patron, a landlord who ignored broken locks or dark stairwells, a venue that provided no security despite a known risk, each can be liable under premises law for a foreseeable attack it failed to prevent. This matters because those businesses carry insurance, and that coverage is often the difference between a judgment on paper and a recovery that is actually paid.

Shared fault and the deadline

Where a negligent-security claim is involved, G.L. c. 231, § 85 governs any argument that you were partly to blame: you can recover unless you were more than half at fault, with any award reduced by your share, and the party raising the argument must prove it while you are presumed to have acted with due care. Timing matters too, because most civil claims must be brought within three years under G.L. c. 260, § 2A, and a business’s video and records can vanish long before that, so acting quickly protects the full cost of a catastrophic injury.

Proving the case

These claims turn on what happened and who could have prevented it, and they are built from evidence that disappears fast. Surveillance video, the police report, medical records, witness accounts, and a business’s history of prior incidents and its security practices together establish both the attack and the negligence behind it. Because much of it is held by the business and overwritten within days, preserving it early, and documenting the head injuries and other harm a beating can cause, is central to the claim.

A record of earlier violence at the same place is especially powerful. When a bar, club, or complex knew of prior assaults and did nothing, that knowledge makes the later attack foreseeable and the failure to act clear negligence. Uncovering that pattern, through incident reports, police calls, and prior complaints, is often what turns a claim against a business from possible into compelling, and what secures the coverage a serious injury needs.

Foreseeability sits at the center of a negligent-security case, and it is worth stating plainly. A business is not automatically liable for every act of violence on its property, but where the danger was foreseeable, from the nature of the place, the hour, or a history of prior trouble, and the business failed to take reasonable precautions, the law can hold it responsible for what those precautions would have prevented. Establishing that foreseeability is usually the heart of the fight.

The failures that support these claims are concrete and provable: too few staff or guards for a busy venue, broken or propped-open doors, dark parking areas, cameras that did not work, a bar that kept serving a violent patron, or a landlord who ignored repeated safety complaints. Each is a decision or an omission that can be documented, and each can connect a business’s negligence directly to the attack that injured you.

It is also worth knowing that being involved in a dispute does not automatically bar a claim. Comparative fault reduces but does not necessarily eliminate a recovery, and responsibility for a foreseeable attack, especially against a business that failed to keep order, is a question to be met with evidence rather than assumed away.

Where an assault and battery happens in Brookline

Brookline is a dense, largely residential community woven into the edge of Boston, and assaults here tend to happen where people gather and where security is thin. The bars and restaurants around Coolidge Corner and Washington Square at closing time, apartment buildings with inadequate lighting or broken entry security, parking areas, and transit stops all see violent incidents, and in each the question is not only who struck the blow but who was responsible for keeping the place reasonably safe. Where an attack happens frequently decides whether a negligent business shares the blame.

Location shapes the evidence and the response. The Brookline Police document serious assaults and generate the report that anchors a civil claim, and many of these locations, storefronts, building entrances, and public areas, have cameras whose footage can capture both the attack and the security failures around it. That video is often overwritten within days unless it is formally demanded, which makes preserving it one of the most urgent steps after a violent incident.

Brookline sits in Norfolk County, and a civil assault claim is generally handled through the Brookline District Court or the Norfolk County courts, entirely separate from any criminal proceeding. Understanding how the local police and courts operate, and coordinating a civil claim alongside a criminal case without disrupting it, is part of the job, and it directly affects the income a serious injury costs you during a long recovery.

What the location proves

The particulars of a place often decide a negligent-security case. Whether the lighting was adequate, whether locks and cameras worked, how much security was present, and whether the business knew of earlier trouble all speak to whether it met its duty. In a compact, walkable town like Brookline, witnesses, neighbors, other patrons, passersby, are frequently close at hand, and identifying them quickly can make the difference in a disputed claim.

Prior incidents at the same address carry particular weight. Police call histories, past assault reports, and complaints from tenants or customers can show a business was on notice of danger and failed to respond, and gathering those local records early is part of building a claim that holds the responsible business accountable.

Brookline’s dense residential character means many attacks occur in and around housing, apartment entryways, shared hallways, and parking areas, where a landlord’s security choices are squarely at issue. Others happen along the town’s commercial corridors and near its transit stops. Matching the investigation to the specific setting, residential, commercial, or public, is part of identifying every responsible party and the coverage behind them.

The costs a violent attack leaves behind

The harm from a violent attack reaches far past the emergency room. A complete claim accounts for the medical care and surgery an assault can require, for the pain, the trauma, and the lasting fear that follow a violent event, often including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress, and for any scarring or lasting disability a serious beating can cause. It also has to account for time and income lost during recovery, and a full and careful accounting of every present and future cost is exactly what an insurer works hardest to minimize.

The emotional and psychological injury deserves particular attention, because it is real, it is compensable, and it is easy for an insurer to overlook. The fear of public places, the disrupted sleep, and the strain on work and relationships are part of what an attack takes, and documenting them with the help of treating professionals is part of valuing the claim honestly rather than settling for the visible injuries alone.

None of this is something a victim should have to manage alone while still healing, in body and in mind. A free, private conversation can explain what your claim may involve, what evidence must be preserved before it disappears, and what the case may be worth, so your decisions are informed rather than rushed. Because these cases are handled on a contingency fee, that guidance comes with no upfront cost.

Facing a business’s insurer alone is not a fair contest. Its adjusters and lawyers work to deny that the attack was foreseeable and to minimize your harm, and an unrepresented victim is unlikely to secure the video or prove the security failures in time. A lawyer who investigates quickly, documents the full harm, and stands firm is what levels the field, and where an attack proves fatal, we can explain what the loss entitles a family to recover.

Because the harm from an attack is often as much psychological as physical, valuing the claim honestly means accounting for both. A scar, a lingering disability, and the cost of surgery are real, but so are the panic in a crowded room, the sleepless nights, and the withdrawal from ordinary life that trauma can bring. Treating professionals can document those effects, and a full claim gives them the weight they deserve.

Acting quickly matters most of all here, because the single best evidence, the security video, is routinely overwritten within days, and a business has little reason to preserve proof of its own negligence. A prompt legal demand to preserve that footage and the related records is frequently the most important step in the entire case, and it is one an injured person is unlikely to manage alone in the aftermath of an attack.

The aim throughout is to make sure a person harmed by violence, and by the failure that allowed it, is not left to carry the cost alone, and to reach the parties and the coverage that can provide a full recovery.

Medical Care and Surgery

Emotional and Psychological Harm

Scarring and Lasting Disability

Lost Wages and Income

Three steps to protect your assault injury claim

Get medical care and a police report

Get medical care right away, both to treat and document your injuries, and make sure the attack is reported to the Brookline police. If you safely can, note the cameras and the names of any witnesses.

Move fast to preserve the video

Surveillance footage from a bar, building, or store is often the best proof of the attack and security failure, and it is overwritten in days, so a prompt demand to preserve it makes a claim provable.

Talk to a lawyer before you settle

A civil claim is separate from any criminal case, and a business's insurer will move to minimize it, so before you accept any offer or give any statement, a free review shows what your claim is worth.

Talk to a Brookline assault and battery lawyer

If you were attacked in Brookline, you may be able to recover from the attacker and from any business whose failed security helped it happen, whether or not there is a criminal case. Talk with our team, or with our Boston personal injury attorney office, for a free and private review of what happened and what your claim may be worth, and let us pursue the responsible parties while you focus on healing.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Brookline assault and battery questions, answered

Can I bring a claim if there's no criminal case?

Yes. A civil claim stands entirely apart from any criminal prosecution and uses a lower standard of proof. You can recover even if the attacker was never arrested or charged, was acquitted, or was never identified. The civil case is about compensating your losses, not about punishing anyone.

Often, through a third party. If a business or property owner failed to provide reasonable security and that failure allowed the attack, its insurance can pay for your harm. That negligent-security claim is frequently the real source of a meaningful recovery when the attacker cannot pay.

It is a claim that a property owner or business did not take reasonable steps, adequate lighting, working locks, security staff, crowd control, to protect people from a foreseeable attack. Where that failure helped an assault happen, the business can be held responsible alongside the attacker.

With evidence that fades quickly: surveillance video, the police report, medical records, witness accounts, and a business’s record of prior incidents and security practices. Because a business controls much of it and overwrites video within days, moving fast to preserve everything is essential to proving the case.

It can, as strong evidence, but it is not required. Because the civil standard of proof is lower, you can win your civil claim without a conviction, and the two proceed separately. We coordinate the civil case so it advances without interfering with any criminal proceeding.

You may still have a claim against a negligent business that failed to protect you, because that claim does not depend on naming the attacker. Establishing the property owner’s failure and its role in the attack can support a full recovery even when the assailant is unknown.

Most civil claims must be brought within three years, though the exact deadline can depend on the facts. It is best to act quickly regardless, because the surveillance video and records that prove a negligent-security claim can disappear within days of the attack.

It depends on the severity of your injuries and their lasting physical and emotional effect, not on an insurer’s first offer. A fair value accounts for medical care, lost income, any scarring or disability, and the trauma, anxiety, and fear that a violent attack so often leaves.

Yes. The psychological harm of a violent attack, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, sleeplessness, and the strain on work and relationships, is real and compensable. Documenting it with treating professionals is an important part of valuing the claim fully rather than settling for the visible injuries.

For a serious attack, yes. These cases require identifying the right defendant, finding the insurance that can pay, and preserving evidence before it vanishes, all while you recover. Your own advocate handles the investigation and the insurer with discretion, so you can focus on healing.

Nothing upfront. These cases are handled on a contingency fee, so you owe no attorney fee unless we recover for you, and the first consultation is free and private. That lets you pursue a full recovery without any financial risk of your own.

Yes. We represent assault and battery victims across Massachusetts, not only in Brookline, including Boston and the neighboring communities. Wherever the attack happened, we can find the responsible parties, preserve the evidence, and pursue the full recovery you are owed.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.