boston personal injury lawyer

The Massachusetts Tort Threshold

The line between a small claim and a full one.

The tort threshold is the line Massachusetts draws for a pain-and-suffering claim: clear it, and you can pursue the at-fault driver for the full harm the crash actually caused you.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBC News Boston logo

What the tort threshold means for you

In Massachusetts, being hurt in a crash is not always enough, by itself, to sue the driver who caused it for everything you lost. Because the state uses a no-fault system, the law sets a gate, the tort threshold, that your injury must pass before you can recover pain and suffering from the at-fault driver. Below the threshold, your losses run through your own PIP coverage; above it, the full range of damages opens up. A Boston personal injury attorney can tell you which side of that line your injury falls on, at no cost.

The threshold matters because pain and suffering is often the largest part of a serious injury claim. Medical bills and lost wages can be added up, but the physical pain, the lasting limitation, and the disruption to your life are frequently worth far more, and none of it is recoverable from the at-fault driver unless the threshold is met. Understanding it early shapes how a claim is built and documented from the start.

Daniel J. Larson represents injured people across Massachusetts and can review whether your injury meets the tort threshold, what that means for the value of your claim, and how to document it properly. The review is free, and there is no obligation.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
Personal Injury Massachusetts Personal Injury Lawyer Dorchester personal injury lawyer Hingham personal injury lawyer Lowell personal injury lawyer New Bedford personal injury lawyer Personal Injury Lawyer Worcester barnstable personal injury lawyer brookline personal injury lawyer barnstable personal injury lawyer brookline personal injury lawyer lowell personal injury lawyer Chelsea Car Accident Lawyer

Why the threshold decides your case.

$300K+ Won For Clients

100+ 5-Star Google Reviews

8+ Years of Legal Expertise

98% Legal Success Rate

100+ Injured Victims Helped

No Win, No Fee Guaranteed

How the tort threshold works.

The dollar path: more than two thousand dollars in bills

Under G.L. c. 231, §6D, you meet the tort threshold if your reasonable and necessary medical expenses for the injury come to more than two thousand dollars. This matters because it makes documentation decisive: the same treatment, fully recorded and billed, can be the difference between a claim that clears the threshold and one that falls short of it.

The injury path: categories that meet it automatically

The statute also lets you clear the threshold regardless of your bills if the injury falls into one of five categories: death, loss of a body member, permanent and serious disfigurement, loss of sight or hearing, or a fracture. This matters because a broken bone, for example, meets the threshold on its own, with no dollar total required at all.

Why the threshold exists: no-fault and PIP

The threshold is part of the no-fault system. Your own PIP coverage under G.L. c. 90, §34A pays early medical bills and part of your lost wages regardless of fault, and the tort threshold is the trade-off: to go beyond those no-fault benefits and sue the at-fault driver for pain and suffering, your injury must be serious enough to cross the line. This matters because it explains why two people hurt in the same crash can end up with very different claims.

What clearing the threshold opens up

Once the threshold is met, you can pursue the at-fault driver for the full range of damages, not only medical bills and lost wages but pain and suffering, permanent impairment, and the lasting effects of the injury. This matters because it is where the real value of a serious claim lives. Massachusetts comparative negligence under G.L. c. 231, §85 then governs how any shared fault reduces the recovery.

Proving the threshold usually comes down to the phrase “reasonable and necessary.” The medical bills that count are the ones for treatment a careful doctor would order for the injury, from the emergency visit through imaging, therapy, and follow-up. Insurers scrutinize this closely, because keeping a claim under the two-thousand-dollar line, or arguing an injury is not as serious as claimed, is how they hold a case to no-fault benefits alone. That is why the way treatment is documented, and tied back to the crash, so often decides which side of the threshold a claim lands on.

One more point often surprises people: the tort threshold and the comparative-negligence rule are two separate gates. Meeting the threshold decides whether a pain-and-suffering claim exists at all; comparative negligence then decides how any shared fault reduces what you recover. A claim can clear the threshold and still be reduced if the injured person bore part of the blame, which is one more reason the facts of how the crash happened matter alongside the medical proof. Sorting out both questions early, rather than after an insurer has framed them, is a large part of protecting the value of a serious claim.

Where the tort threshold comes up

The tort threshold applies to any injury arising out of the operation of a motor vehicle, so it comes up across the crash cases we handle. A driver or passenger hurt in a Boston car accident, or the more serious Boston truck accident, must meet it to recover pain and suffering, and so must the vulnerable road users a vehicle strikes: an injured Boston pedestrian, a Boston cyclist, or a rider on a Boston scooter. A Boston motorcyclist, though generally outside PIP, faces the very same threshold to recover pain and suffering from the driver at fault.

What changes from case to case is how the threshold is met. A high-speed collision that breaks a bone clears it instantly through the injury path; a lower-speed crash that causes soft-tissue injury may clear it only through the dollar path, once treatment is documented. Knowing which path a case is on shapes how it is built and what evidence matters most.

Because the threshold sits between a basic no-fault claim and a full injury claim, it is often the first thing worth assessing after a crash. Getting it right early, and documenting the injury to support it, is what keeps a serious claim from being quietly undervalued as a minor one.

It is also worth understanding what the threshold does not change. It does not affect your right to PIP benefits, which pay regardless of fault and regardless of the threshold; it only governs whether you can go further and pursue the at-fault driver for pain and suffering. Nor does it change the filing deadline, which runs separately. What it does change is the ceiling on a claim: below the threshold, recovery is essentially the no-fault benefits; above it, the full value of a serious injury becomes available. That gap is why the threshold is so often the pivotal question in a Massachusetts crash case.

How injuries clear the threshold.

In practice, injuries clear the tort threshold in a few recognizable ways. A fracture, however small, meets it outright, as do the other statutory categories such as permanent scarring or loss of a sense. Injuries that do not fit a category, like whiplash, a disc strain, or other soft-tissue harm, clear the threshold through the dollar path, once reasonable and necessary treatment passes two thousand dollars.

This is where disputes arise. Insurers challenge whether treatment was reasonable and necessary, whether a scar is truly permanent and serious, or whether a soft-tissue injury is as significant as claimed, all to keep a case below the line. Meeting those arguments takes complete medical records and, at times, a treating doctor’s opinion, which is why thorough documentation from the first visit matters so much.

The practical takeaway is to treat your injury seriously and record everything. Follow through on the care your doctors recommend, keep every bill and report, and get advice early, because whether a claim clears the tort threshold is often decided by how well the injury was documented, not by how badly it actually hurt.

Because so much turns on documentation, the most useful thing an injured person can do is treat the injury as seriously as it deserves and let the record reflect it. Gaps in treatment, missed appointments, and undocumented complaints all give an insurer room to argue the injury was minor. Consistent care, clear records, and, where needed, a treating physician’s assessment of permanency are what carry a borderline case over the line. None of this is about exaggerating an injury; it is about making sure a real one is not undervalued because the paperwork failed to keep up with it.

When an injury clearly meets a statutory category, the analysis is simpler, and the focus shifts to valuing the harm. A permanent scar, a lost or impaired sense, or a fracture that heals imperfectly can carry lasting effects long after the bills stop, and those effects are exactly what pain-and-suffering damages are meant to address. Capturing the full arc of the injury, not just its first weeks, is where a serious threshold claim is won.

In the end, whether a case clears the tort threshold is a question of proof, and proof is something a careful claim can build.

Medical Bills and Future Care

Lost Wages and Earning Capacity

Pain, Suffering, and Hardship

Wrongful Death of a Loved One

How to protect a threshold claim.

Document all your injuries in full.

Get medical care from the outset and keep every record, bill, and image, because whether your injury clears the tort threshold turns on how completely the treatment is documented from the first visit.

Keep treating and keep the records.

Follow through on the care the doctors recommend and save everything, because consistent, documented treatment is what proves a soft-tissue injury crossed the dollar path rather than fading by itself.

Ask a lawyer where you truly stand.

Have a lawyer assess as soon as you can whether your injury meets this threshold by dollar figure or by category, because knowing which side of the line you are on early shapes how the claim is built.

Not sure if you meet the tort threshold?

If you are not sure whether your injury clears the tort threshold, or an insurer is arguing that it does not, you do not have to sort it out alone. Larson Law will review your injury and treatment, tell you which side of the line you are on, and pursue the full value of your claim if the threshold is met. Call today for a free, no-obligation consultation, and pay nothing unless we recover for you.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Our Practice Areas.

Larson Law helps injured people across Massachusetts understand exactly where their claim stands. The tort threshold decides whether a crash becomes a basic no-fault matter or a full injury claim, and proving it is met is often what unlocks the real value of a case.

Personal injury law in Boston answered directly.

Do I have a personal injury claim?

You may, if someone else’s carelessness caused your injury. The key questions are whether another person or company was negligent, whether that negligence caused your injury, and how serious the harm is. Many people are unsure whether their situation rises to a claim, especially when an insurer downplays it. A free review with an attorney is the best way to find out, because we can look at the facts, the evidence, and the insurance and tell you honestly whether you have a case and what it may be worth, at no cost to you.

We handle the full range of serious injury and wrongful death cases, including car, truck, motorcycle, bus, rideshare, bicycle, and pedestrian crashes, slip and fall and other premises injuries, dog bites and animal attacks, injuries from dangerous or defective products, and fatal accidents. What these cases share is that someone was hurt by conduct that should not have happened. If you are not sure whether your situation fits, the simplest thing is to ask; the review is free, and we will tell you honestly whether we can help.

It depends on the severity of the injuries and their lasting effects. Value can reflect past and future medical care, lost wages and reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and the long-term impact of a serious or permanent injury, along with property damage in a crash. Every case is different, and the future care is often the largest part of a serious claim. Be cautious of anyone who promises a number up front; a careful attorney evaluates the claim only after reviewing how the injury happened and the full medical picture.

You can still recover as long as you were not more than half to blame. Under comparative negligence, MGL Chapter 231 Section 85, your compensation is reduced by your share of fault but not eliminated unless that share passes fifty percent. Insurers often exaggerate the injured person’s role to cut what they pay, sometimes based on little evidence. An attorney can present the full picture of how the injury happened and protect your recovery from an unfair or inflated fault argument.

It is best to be cautious. The other side’s insurer, and sometimes even your own, may contact you quickly and sound friendly, but their goal is to limit what they pay, and an early recorded statement can be used against you while you are still hurting. You are not required to give one. An attorney can deal with the insurers for you, so you do not say something that is later taken out of context, and so the focus stays on the other side’s fault and your recovery rather than on the insurer’s bottom line.

Most injury claims must be filed within three years under MGL Chapter 260 Section 2A, and for an injured child the deadline is paused under MGL Chapter 260 Section 7. Claims involving a city or other public entity can carry much shorter notice deadlines. Because evidence fades and cameras record over their footage within days, it is best to act soon so the proof can be preserved well before any deadline approaches.

You can. Larson Law handles injury claims on a contingency fee, which means there is no charge unless we recover money for you, and the first review is always free. We advance the costs of investigating the claim and working with any experts the case needs. You do not pay out of pocket while you recover, and we are only paid from a successful result. That arrangement exists so that anyone, regardless of their finances, can afford strong legal help after a serious injury.

For a minor injury you may not, but for any serious injury an attorney usually makes a real difference. Insurers settle for less when no lawyer is involved, and the rules around fault, deadlines, and coverage are easy to get wrong on your own. An attorney levels the field, handles the insurers, proves the claim, and pursues the full value while you focus on recovering. Because the first review is free and we work on a contingency fee, there is no cost to find out whether you need one and what your claim may be worth.

It depends on the case. Some claims resolve in a matter of months through negotiation, while others, especially serious injuries that are still healing or cases an insurer refuses to value fairly, take longer and may require filing suit. It is usually wise not to settle until the full extent of your injuries is known, since you generally cannot reopen a claim later. An attorney can give you a realistic timeline for your situation and work to move the case as efficiently as possible without leaving money on the table.

If an injury proved fatal, close family may bring a wrongful death claim under MGL Chapter 229. Such a claim can seek compensation for the loss of the person’s income, services, companionship, and guidance, along with funeral and related expenses. These cases are painful and the legal steps are complex, and an attorney can handle the investigation and the filings so the family can focus on each other, never paying anything up front and owing a fee only if there is a recovery.

Nothing upfront. Larson Law handles personal injury claims on a contingency fee, so there is no charge unless we recover money for you, and the first review is always free. We advance the costs of investigating the claim, obtaining the records, and working with experts. We are only paid from a successful result, which lets an injured person take on the insurers without paying out of pocket while they recover, so cost is never a reason to wait to find out what your claim may be worth.

Get medical care right away, even if you feel okay, since some injuries appear hours or days later, and keep every record. Write down how it happened, photograph the scene, the cause, and your injuries, and get the names of any witnesses while it is fresh. Report the accident as appropriate. Avoid giving the insurer a recorded statement or signing anything before you have spoken with an attorney, who can preserve the evidence and protect both your health and your claim from the start.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.