Attorney Daniel J. Larson

MASSACHUSETTS SLIP AND FALL LAWYER

An inspection log alone can decide who pays for a fall.

Those sheets are often filled in at the end of a shift rather than during it. The gap between what the paper says and what the floor actually looked like is where these cases turn.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBS News Boston logo

Where their records stop matching the floor.

Falls get treated as clumsiness, including by the person who fell. That assumption is the first thing an insurer leans on, and it is usually wrong. A floor that is safe to walk on does not become unsafe because somebody walked on it.

Older people in particular are told, often by people who care about them, that a fall is a sign of getting older rather than a sign that a floor was wrong. Both can be true at once, and only one of them is somebody’s responsibility.

Very little of the argument is about whether you fell. It is about what you fell on, how long it had been there, and whether anyone was meant to have noticed. Three separate questions, each answered from a different place.

What you fell on is answered at the scene, and it goes first. A spill gets mopped within minutes of an incident, sometimes by the same person who came to help you up. A photograph taken before the mop arrives is worth more than any description given later, and the only tool it needs is the phone already in your pocket.

How long it had been there is answered from the store’s own records. Cleaning schedules, inspection rounds, and whatever sheet was signed to say the area had been walked. Those are produced in response to a request rather than volunteered, and the request has to name what it wants.

Whether anyone should have noticed is settled by putting the first two side by side. A sheet claiming a check at a stated time, against a spill that had plainly been there longer, does more work than any witness.

Expect the case against you to be about your body rather than their floor. What you had on your feet. Whether your hands were full. Whether you had been in that building before and knew the layout. None of those end a claim on their own, and all of them reduce the figure if nobody answers them.

Daniel J. Larson takes these cases across the state. If the records have already been overwritten, or the timing has run, you will hear that at the first conversation rather than after months of work.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
★★★★★
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
★★★★★
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
★★★★★
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
★★★★★
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
★★★★★
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
★★★★★
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
★★★★★
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
slip and fall lawyer Quincy MA Brockton slip and fall lawyer Worcester slip and fall lawyer Massachusetts slip and fall lawyer Dorchester slip and fall lawyer Boston slip and fall lawyer Lowell slip and fall lawyer New Bedford slip and fall lawyer weymouth slip and fall lawyer weymouth slip and fall lawyer new bedford slip and fall lawyer Brighton slip and fall lawyer Chelsea Slip and Fall Lawyer

The request names the hour and the aisle.

The three rules behind a fall claim.

How often is often enough

The duty is not to keep a floor perfect, because nobody can. It is to check often enough that a hazard does not sit there unnoticed, and to deal with it or warn about it once it is found.

That turns a vague word into a number. How frequently was this area meant to be walked? Every thirty minutes, every hour, once a shift? Businesses set their own intervals, write them down, and are then measured against what they wrote. A company that decided hourly checks were enough has a harder time calling a spill of fifty minutes undiscoverable.

The interval also has to suit the place. A schedule that works for a quiet corridor is not the schedule for an entrance in bad weather, and a business running one interval everywhere has a problem wherever the risk was concentrated.

Weather does not lower the standard

Snow and ice are held to the same standard as any other hazard, so a fall on an untreated walkway can support a claim. Cold weather is not a defense in a state where it snows every year.

What counts as reasonable treatment is judged against the traffic the area carries, the seriousness of the risk, and the effort clearing it would have taken. A doorway everyone uses is not the same as a corner of a car park.

More than one deadline runs at once

Three years to file, counted from the fall. For a child the three years do not begin until they turn eighteen.

Ice carries a second and much shorter clock. A written notice giving the time, the place and the cause has to reach the responsible party within thirty days, and it has to reach the correct one, which is harder than it sounds where an owner, a manager and a contractor all had a hand in the same walkway.

A claim against a city or a town runs on its own notice schedule as well, shorter than the three years and easy to miss. So a fall can carry three separate deadlines, and the one that ends most claims is never the long one.

People get up, say they are fine, and go home.

The hours before anyone writes it down

Almost nobody goes to hospital from the floor. They finish the shop, drive home, and wait to see how it feels tomorrow. It is a reasonable thing to do, and it costs more than anything else people do after a fall.

Two things happen in that gap. The injury worsens without anything recording that it began at the fall, and the business gets a clear run at the scene. By the time a claim arrives, the records show somebody who did not seem hurt enough to seek help, and the floor shows nothing at all.

The answer is not drama. It is a same day visit, even a short one, so that a date exists, and a message to somebody describing what happened while it is fresh. A text sent that evening is a dated record whether anyone meant it as one or not.

Why falls get underestimated

A fall loads the body in a moment, in a direction it was never braced for. Wrists and hips take it because they reach the ground first, and the back takes whatever is left. Much of that presents as stiffness on the day and as something considerably worse a week later.

Age changes the arithmetic rather than the blame. The same fall that leaves one person bruised can start a chain for another that ends somewhere entirely different, and an insurer will reach for the pre existing condition argument straight away.

That argument is answered with records rather than indignation. What somebody could do the week before, set against what they could do the week after, is the comparison that settles it, and it is far easier to make when a person thought to write something down at the time.

The number follows the recovery, not the fall.

Recovery from a fall rarely runs in a straight line. There is a stretch of improvement, then a plateau, and it is the plateau that tells you what the fall actually cost. Agreeing a figure before that point means guessing, and the guess is never the generous one. The plateau is also where a different question gets answered. Not what was spent getting back, but what did not come back at all. In most falls that second figure is the larger one, and it is the one that has to be argued rather than invoiced.

Medical Bills and Future Care

Lost Wages and Earning Capacity

Pain, Suffering, and Hardship

Wrongful Death of a Loved One

Before you drive home and wait it out.

Get medical care and keep records

See a doctor the same day, even if you feel only shaken, because some injuries surface later and your medical records tie the harm to the incident. Keep every bill, note, and receipt that you receive.

Document the scene and the cause

Photograph what hurt you, the vehicles, the hazard, or the whole scene, and collect the names and numbers of anyone who saw it happen. Do not give a recorded statement to any insurer just yet, either.

Talk to a lawyer before the insurer

Before you accept any offer or sign any release, have a lawyer review the cause and the long term cost of your care. An early review protects the evidence and the deadline that controls your recovery.

A Massachusetts slip and fall lawyer writes that letter.

The first thing worth establishing is whether anything was written down at the time. An incident report filled in at the store, a name taken, a call to a manager, a message sent to somebody that evening. Any of those fixes a date, and a date is what a records request gets built on. If nothing was recorded, say so plainly rather than working around it. Claims still proceed from a date and a location alone, and it is better to know at the start which of those two positions you are in.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Fall injury questions, answered.

Do I have a claim if I fell on someone's property?

You may, if the property owner’s failure to keep the premises reasonably safe caused your fall. Owners must address or warn about hazards they know or should know about, like wet floors, broken stairs, poor lighting, or ice. The key questions are whether a dangerous condition existed, whether the owner should have fixed it, and whether it caused your injury. A free review can tell you whether your fall fits these standards.

Not necessarily. Owners sometimes argue that a hazard was ‘open and obvious’ to avoid responsibility, but that defense does not always work, especially when the owner should have expected people to encounter the hazard anyway or when conditions made it hard to see. Even where it applies, it may reduce rather than eliminate a claim. A lawyer can assess how that argument is likely to play out on your facts.

You may still have a claim. Massachusetts holds property owners to a duty of reasonable care for snow and ice, so a fall on an icy walkway or untreated lot can support a claim when the owner failed to act reasonably in clearing or treating it. These cases turn on what the owner did and when, and on weather records and timing, so prompt documentation is important to show the condition was unreasonable.

Generally three things: that a dangerous condition existed on the property, that the owner knew or should have known about it and failed to fix or warn of it, and that the condition caused your injury. Showing the hazard existed long enough that a careful owner would have caught it is often key. Photographs, witness accounts, incident reports, and maintenance records all help establish these elements.

That is a common defense, but knowledge can be shown in more than one way. An owner is responsible not only for hazards they actually knew about but also for those they should have discovered through reasonable inspection. If a spill or hazard existed long enough that a careful owner would have found and fixed it, the store can still be liable. Maintenance logs, video, and witness accounts often reveal what the store knew or should have known.

Three years, and the word carrying the weight in that sentence is filed. Filed means started in court. It does not mean reported to the insurer and it does not mean under discussion. A claim can sit in negotiation for two and a half years, letters going back and forth the whole time, and none of it moves the date. The other side knows that, which is one reason an unhurried adjuster is not always a disorganised one. Shorter clocks also run alongside the three years, and if the fall was on ice or on public ground at least one of them is far shorter.

Most people are, at least a little, and it stops far fewer claims than it stops phone calls. The rule is that your share comes off the total rather than ending it, up to half. What that means in money is worth being blunt about. On a claim worth a hundred thousand, a twenty percent share is twenty thousand gone. The percentage is not a technicality, it is the largest single discount anyone will try to apply. It is also not handed down by anybody neutral. In almost every case that never reaches a courtroom, the figure is proposed by an adjuster and then either accepted or argued down. Treating it as a finding rather than an opening position is how people lose money they were entitled to.

It depends on the severity of the injury. Value can reflect medical care, surgery and rehabilitation, lost wages, pain and suffering, and lasting effects like a fracture, chronic pain, or a head injury. Falls are especially serious for older adults, where a single injury can affect independence for good. A lawyer can evaluate the claim after reviewing how the fall happened and the full medical picture.

Stores and restaurants are common places for falls, often from spills, freshly mopped floors without warning signs, or cluttered aisles. These businesses usually keep incident reports and surveillance video, which can be powerful evidence, but they are not always preserved unless requested promptly. Reporting the fall to the manager and getting a copy of any incident report, then contacting a lawyer quickly, helps secure that evidence.

Yes, and a fall is the situation where that claim is most often missed. It gets missed because of the gap. A fall in one month and a death some weeks afterwards do not look connected on paper, and what you will meet is an argument that age or an existing condition did it and the fall was incidental. Answering that takes the medical record read as a sequence instead of a list, showing what changed and when. The claim is also brought differently. It belongs to the estate, not to relatives in their own names, which means a court has to appoint someone first, and nobody budgets time for that step. The wider picture604 is set out separately.

If you can, report the fall to the property owner or manager and ask that an incident report be made. Photograph the hazard and the area right away, before it is cleaned up, and get the names of any witnesses. Get medical care promptly, since some injuries worsen over time. Avoid giving a recorded statement to the property’s insurer or signing anything, and speak with a lawyer while the evidence still exists.

Nothing upfront. Larson Law handles slip and fall claims on a contingency fee, so there is no charge unless we recover money for you, and the first review is free. We advance the costs of investigating the property and preserving evidence. We only get paid from a successful result, which lets an injured person take on a business and its insurer without paying out of pocket while they recover.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.