MASSACHUSETTS PREMISES LIABILITY LAWYER
When a property owner ignores a hazard, people get hurt.
A wet floor, a broken stair, or unshoveled ice can send you to the hospital, and Massachusetts law makes the property owner answer for the harm when reasonable care was missing.
- No fee unless we win
- Same-day response
- Free case review
As Seen On:
In Massachusetts, premises liability comes down to reasonable care.
Massachusetts premises liability law rests on a single, powerful idea: anyone who owns or controls property owes a duty of reasonable care to the people lawfully on it. The state did away with the old system that gave guests, customers, and other visitors different levels of protection, so today a shopper, a tenant, a dinner guest, and a delivery worker are all owed the same reasonable care. That duty means keeping the property reasonably safe, inspecting for hazards, and fixing or warning about dangers the owner knew about or should have discovered through reasonable care. These claims cover far more than a slip on a wet floor: broken stairs and missing railings, poor lighting, unshoveled snow and ice, falling merchandise, uneven walkways, exposed wiring, and crime made possible by inadequate security all fall under premises liability. What a claim turns on is proof that a dangerous condition existed, that the owner had actual or constructive notice of it, and that they failed to act in a reasonable time. Constructive notice means the hazard was there long enough that a careful owner should have found and fixed it, and in self-service stores the law can presume notice when the store’s own method of operation creates the risk. Owners and their insurers fight these cases hard, often arguing the hazard was open and obvious or that the visitor was careless, so photographs, witness names, and incident reports gathered early are decisive. Snow and ice claims carry an added trap: a short written-notice deadline that can quietly end a valid case before it starts. Getting the condition, the notice, and the responsible parties right from the beginning is what turns an injury into a real recovery.
Larson Law handles these claims across Massachusetts. If you were hurt on someone else’s property, a Massachusetts premises liability lawyer can review what happened at no cost.
What our clients say
Unsafe property cases are won on documented conditions.
- We handle slip and fall, snow and ice, negligent security, and stairway cases statewide
- We prove actual or constructive notice with inspection logs, footage, and maintenance records
- We move fast to preserve surveillance video before the property overwrites it
- We meet the strict thirty-day snow-and-ice notice deadline that defeats unprepared claims
- We identify owners, tenants, managers, and contractors who each may share liability
- No fee unless we win your case
- No upfront costs
- Direct attorney access throughout
- Same-day response anywhere in Massachusetts
$300K+ Won For Clients
100+ 5-Star Google Reviews
8+ Years of Legal Expertise
98% Legal Success Rate
100+ Injured Victims Helped
No Win, No Fee Guaranteed
Property owners owe every lawful visitor reasonable care.
One duty of reasonable care to every lawful visitor
Massachusetts abolished the old categories that gave invitees, licensees, and social guests different protection. Today an owner or anyone in control of property owes a single duty of reasonable care to all lawful visitors. That means keeping the premises reasonably safe, inspecting for dangers on a sensible schedule, and repairing or warning about hazards the owner knew about or should have discovered. Liability usually turns on notice: a plaintiff must show the owner had actual notice of the hazard or constructive notice, meaning the condition existed long enough that a reasonable owner should have found and addressed it. Inspection logs, cleaning schedules, and maintenance records often decide that question. In self-service stores, a mode-of-operation approach can relieve an injured customer of proving exactly how long a spill sat on the floor when the store’s chosen way of doing business made spills foreseeable in the first place.
Snow, ice, and the thirty-day notice
For decades Massachusetts shielded owners from liability for natural accumulations of snow and ice. That changed in 2010, when the Supreme Judicial Court abolished the natural-versus-unnatural distinction and applied the same reasonable-care duty to snow and ice as to every other hazard. An owner must now take reasonable steps to clear or treat dangerous accumulations, judged by the foot traffic expected, the seriousness of the risk, and the burden of removal. But snow and ice claims carry a strict procedural rule: under MGL Ch. 84 Sec. 21, a person injured by snow or ice must give written notice of the time, place, and cause to the responsible party within thirty days, and missing that deadline can defeat an otherwise strong claim.
Negligent security, landlords, and comparative fault
Premises liability also covers harm from foreseeable crime when an owner fails to provide reasonable security, such as working locks, adequate lighting, or controlled access in a building with a known history of incidents. Landlords owe tenants and visitors reasonable care in the common areas they control, including stairwells, hallways, and parking areas, under MGL Ch. 186. Massachusetts follows modified comparative negligence under MGL Ch. 231 Sec. 85, so a visitor partly at fault can still recover as long as their share stays at fifty percent or less, with any award reduced by their percentage. A claim must generally be filed within three years under MGL Ch. 260 Sec. 2A.
Premises liability claims arise across every Massachusetts setting.
Where premises injuries happen across Massachusetts
Premises injuries occur in every setting across the state: grocery and retail stores, restaurants and bars, apartment buildings and condominiums, parking lots and garages, hotels, office buildings, gyms, and on the sidewalks and entryways that front them. Falls on stairs, wet or freshly mopped floors, broken pavement, and snow-covered walkways are the most common, but inadequate lighting, unsecured rugs, falling merchandise, potholes in lots, and poorly maintained elevators and escalators injure people too. From dense Boston neighborhoods to suburban shopping plazas and rural properties, the same reasonable-care duty applies, and the location often decides which businesses and which insurers end up involved in the claim.
Who is responsible beyond the owner
The party who owns the building is not always the only one responsible. A tenant business in control of its space, a property management company, a maintenance or snow-removal contractor, or a store operator can each bear a share of liability depending on who controlled the area and who created or ignored the hazard. A signed snow-removal or maintenance contract often shifts responsibility in ways that are not obvious from the scene. Untangling these relationships early matters, because the responsible party and the policy that pays are not always obvious, and several insurers may each try to point the finger at the others. Identifying every potentially liable party at the outset keeps any one of them from quietly escaping responsibility while the others underpay.
Insurance, evidence, and deadlines
Most premises claims are paid through commercial general liability, homeowner, or business insurance, and the practical work of a claim is preserving proof before it disappears. Surveillance video is often overwritten within days or weeks, so a prompt written demand to preserve footage can make or break a case, along with photographs of the hazard, the names of witnesses, and the property own incident report. Consistent medical treatment from the day of the fall ties the injury to the hazard and blunts the insurer argument that something else caused it. Snow and ice claims must satisfy the thirty-day written-notice rule, and most premises claims must be filed within the three-year deadline set by MGL Ch. 260 Sec. 2A. When the property belongs to a city, town, or state agency, the Massachusetts Tort Claims Act adds its own presentment requirement under MGL Ch. 258 Sec. 4, with a shorter window, so public-property claims need especially early attention.
Compensation reaches well beyond the emergency room bill.
What a premises liability claim can recover depends on the severity of the injury, whether it leaves lasting impairment, the cost of current and future medical care, and the income lost while recovering. Falls frequently cause fractures, head injuries, and spinal damage that need long-term treatment the claim should account for.
Medical Bills and Future Treatment
Lost Wages and Earning Capacity
Pain, Suffering, and Disability
Long-Term Care and Home Costs
Act fast after a fall to preserve the scene and the evidence.
Document the hazard and get care
Photograph the hazard that caused your fall, get the names of any witnesses, and ask the property manager to file an incident report, then get medical care and keep every record from that first visit.
Talk to a premises liability lawyer free
Call us or use the form. A Massachusetts premises liability lawyer will identify who controlled the property, preserve the evidence, and explain what your claim could support, at no cost to you today.
We preserve evidence and build the case
We send preservation demands for the surveillance video, document the dangerous condition and any notice, handle the insurers, and pursue the full value of your Massachusetts premises liability claim.
- 5.0 stars out of 100+ reviews
Get a Massachusetts premises liability lawyer on the case now.
A premises liability claim is strongest when it begins early, while the hazard can still be photographed, surveillance footage still exists, witnesses still remember, and any snow-and-ice notice deadline can still be met. Tell us where you were hurt, what condition caused it, and who owns or runs the property, and we will identify every responsible party and the insurance that applies, then explain what your claim may support. When a fall or other property hazard in Massachusetts causes a death, the surviving family may bring a wrongful death claim under MGL Ch. 229 alongside the injury claim.
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.
Our Clients.
Our Practice Areas.
We handle premises liability, slip and fall, car accidents, dog bite, wrongful death, and more across Massachusetts. For vehicle crashes statewide, see our Massachusetts car accident lawyer page.
Your premises liability questions, answered directly.
Do I have to prove the owner knew about the hazard?
Usually yes, in one of two ways. You must show the owner had actual notice of the hazard, or constructive notice, meaning the dangerous condition existed long enough that a reasonable owner inspecting the property should have found and fixed it. Inspection logs, cleaning schedules, and maintenance records often settle the question, and in self-service stores a mode-of-operation theory can ease that burden when the store’s setup made the hazard foreseeable.
I slipped on snow or ice. Are the rules different?
The duty is the same, but the deadline is not. Since 2010, Massachusetts holds owners to the ordinary reasonable-care standard for snow and ice rather than excusing natural accumulations. However, under MGL Ch. 84 Sec. 21, anyone injured by snow or ice must give the responsible party written notice of the time, place, and cause within thirty days. Missing that short window can end an otherwise valid claim, so snow and ice cases need immediate attention.
The owner says the hazard was open and obvious. Does that end my claim?
Not necessarily. The open-and-obvious doctrine can limit a claim, but it does not automatically end one. An owner may still be liable where it was foreseeable that visitors would encounter the hazard anyway, or where the owner could have remedied it with reasonable effort. How obvious the danger truly was, and what the owner did about it, are fact questions that rarely resolve in the insurer’s favor on their say-so alone.
I was partly at fault for my fall. Can I still recover?
Likely yes. Massachusetts follows modified comparative negligence under MGL Ch. 231 Sec. 85. As long as your share of fault is fifty percent or less, you can still recover, with your award reduced by your percentage. Insurers routinely exaggerate a visitor’s fault to cut what they pay, so it is worth testing that argument against the actual evidence rather than accepting it.
How long do I have to file a Massachusetts premises liability claim?
Under MGL Ch. 260 Sec. 2A, you generally have three years from the date of injury to file. For a child, the clock does not start until age eighteen. Remember that snow and ice claims also require written notice within thirty days under MGL Ch. 84 Sec. 21, a separate and much shorter deadline, so acting quickly protects both.
I fell on a spill in a store. What do I have to prove?
You generally must show the spill was a dangerous condition the store knew or should have known about. A mode-of-operation approach can help when the store’s self-service setup made spills foreseeable, easing the need to prove exactly how long it sat there. Photographs, the store’s incident report, and surveillance footage are key, which is why preserving them right away matters so much.
I was hurt in my apartment building’s common area. Who is liable?
A landlord owes tenants and visitors reasonable care in the common areas it controls, such as stairwells, hallways, lobbies, and parking areas, with related duties under MGL Ch. 186. A property management company or maintenance contractor may also share responsibility. Who controlled the area where you fell, and who knew of the hazard, determines which parties and policies are on the hook.
I was assaulted because of poor security. Is that premises liability?
It can be. When an owner fails to provide reasonable security, such as functioning locks, adequate lighting, or controlled access, in a place where crime was foreseeable, a resulting assault can support a negligent security claim. Liability depends on what the owner knew about prior incidents in the area and what reasonable measures could have prevented the harm.
I fell at a friend’s home. Do I have to sue my friend personally?
Almost never personally. Injuries at a private home are typically covered by the homeowner’s liability insurance, which exists for exactly this situation. Pursuing the claim means dealing with the insurance company, not your friend’s savings, so you can be compensated without putting a personal relationship or someone’s finances at risk.
The store has video of my fall. Will I be able to get it?
Often only if you act fast. Surveillance video is frequently overwritten within days or a few weeks, so a prompt written demand to preserve the footage is critical, and the failure to keep it after such a demand can itself help your case. We send preservation letters immediately and pursue the video through the claim if the property resists.
My child was hurt on someone else’s property. Are there special rules?
Yes. Owners owe reasonable care regarding conditions that can foreseeably harm children, and the attractive-nuisance doctrine can apply to features like pools and equipment that draw kids in. A claim for a minor is brought by a parent or guardian, and under MGL Ch. 260 Sec. 2A the filing deadline does not begin until the child turns eighteen.
I fell on city or state property. Is that claim different?
Yes, and the rules are stricter. Claims against a city, town, or state agency fall under the Massachusetts Tort Claims Act, MGL Ch. 258 Sec. 4, which requires written presentment to the public entity within a set period before suit and imposes a statutory cap on damages. Because the presentment window is shorter than the ordinary deadline, public-property claims need attention right away.
Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.