boston personal injury lawyer

INTERSECTION ACCIDENT LAWYER

Who had the green?
The crash hinges on it.

Intersection crashes turn on who had the right of way, and when another driver ran the light or failed to yield, Massachusetts law lets you recover fully for the harm that follows.

As Seen On:

NBC News
WBZ CBC News Boston logo

What an intersection accident lawyer proves for you.

Intersections are where the most paths cross and where the most can go wrong, so it is no surprise that a large share of serious crashes happen at them. In the space of a few seconds, vehicles turning, stopping, and crossing all depend on one another to follow the signals and the right-of-way rules, and when a single driver runs a red light, rolls a stop sign, or turns across oncoming traffic, the result is often a violent side-impact or turning collision. Because the sides of a vehicle offer far less protection than the front or rear, intersection crashes cause a disproportionate number of severe injuries.

What makes these cases legally difficult is that fault is so often disputed. Each driver insists the light was green, that they had the right of way, that the other one came out of nowhere. Unlike a rear-end crash, where responsibility is usually clear, an intersection collision frequently comes down to reconstructing exactly who did what and when, using the traffic signals, any camera footage, the physical evidence, and independent witnesses. That investigation is where these cases are won or lost, and our Boston personal injury attorney team pursues it aggressively before the evidence disappears.

The injuries from an intersection crash arrive in two phases. In the short term there is the immediate trauma of a side or turning impact: whiplash, broken bones, cuts from shattered glass, and the head and chest injuries a side collision so readily causes. Then come the lasting effects, which in a serious intersection crash can be severe, from traumatic brain injury and spinal damage to chronic pain and permanent disability, especially for anyone struck on the side where the crumple space is thin. A claim that treats a side-impact crash as routine misses how much harm it can do.

Because fault is contested and the evidence is perishable, the early hours and days after an intersection crash matter enormously. Signal-timing data, surveillance and traffic-camera footage, and witness memories all fade or vanish quickly, and the driver who was truly at fault has every reason to tell the story their own way. Preserving that proof early, alongside prompt medical care, is what keeps a legitimate claim from collapsing into one driver’s word against another’s.

This page explains how intersection crashes happen, how Massachusetts law assigns fault and pays for injuries, what the short-term and lasting effects look like, and how a claim is built. If another driver caused an intersection crash that hurt you, a free review can tell you where you stand at no cost and with no obligation. There is a reason intersection cases so often come down to a swearing contest. Two drivers approach the same point from different directions, each watching their own light and their own path, and after a violent collision neither has a complete, reliable picture of what the other was doing. Memory fills the gaps in the direction of self-interest, honestly or not. The only way past that is proof that does not take sides, the signal-timing records, the camera footage, and the physical marks on the road and the vehicles, and building the case means finding that proof before it is gone.

What our clients say

Jeffrey K.
Attorney Larson or Dan as I refer to him now is a phenomenal lawyer who has turned into a friend. He is knowledgeable, smart, extremely thorough and aggressive. He knows the law and delivers fantastic results in a timely fashion. I consider him a great partner and someone I always want to have in my court/corner when I need legal guidance, and support.
Samantha N.
I can’t say enough wonderful things about Dan and his personal injury firm. I’ve seen firsthand how dedicated, knowledgeable, and compassionate he is. Dan is the type of car accident attorney who truly goes above and beyond—he communicates clearly, fights hard for his clients, and genuinely cares about getting them the best possible results.
Jamal B.
Dan and the whole team at Larson Law were super helpful and informative, they were able to walk me through the whole process of my case and they did everything to make sure that I received proper compensation for the incident that happened to me. And I am glad to say that I am very satisfied with the services provided to me by Larson Law. Great team!
Megan A.
Dan was amazing to work with after my car accident. He kept me updated the whole time, explained everything clearly, and always responded quickly. Great communication and a great outcome—highly recommend!
Johnny M.
Dan helped me with a car accident and it was so easy and he is very communicative and reallly helps you out with all he can! Thanks again Dan!
Sina A.
Dan is the Man. He helped me recover from my car accident and the communication and whole process was smooth sailing. Thank you Dan. God speed.
Lee L.
Attorney Larson of Larson Law Did a great job with my case.. I was in a auto accident in 2024 Attorney Larson took my personal injury case and in 2025 I received a maximum payout. Anytime I had a question or concern he was always available.
Personal Injury Massachusetts Personal Injury Lawyer Dorchester personal injury lawyer Hingham personal injury lawyer Lowell personal injury lawyer New Bedford personal injury lawyer Personal Injury Lawyer Worcester barnstable personal injury lawyer brookline personal injury lawyer barnstable personal injury lawyer brookline personal injury lawyer lowell personal injury lawyer Chelsea Car Accident Lawyer

A contested crash still has a clear answer.

$300K+ Won For Clients

100+ 5-Star Google Reviews

8+ Years of Legal Expertise

98% Legal Success Rate

100+ Injured Victims Helped

No Win, No Fee Guaranteed

How Massachusetts law treats intersection crashes.

Right of way and the driver at fault

Massachusetts traffic law sets out who must yield at every kind of intersection, whether controlled by a light, a stop sign, or nothing at all, and fault usually rests with the driver who violated those rules by running a signal, failing to yield, or turning into traffic that had the right of way. The trouble is that these violations are easy to allege and hard to admit, so in practice fault turns on proof rather than on either driver’s account, which is why the signal timing, the camera footage, and the witnesses matter so much.

PIP, the tort threshold, and your bills

After a crash, personal injury protection under MGL c.90 §34M pays your initial medical bills and part of your lost wages regardless of fault. To recover for pain and suffering, a motor-vehicle claim must generally meet the tort threshold in MGL c.231 §6D, which the genuine injuries a side-impact crash causes ordinarily satisfy. Knowing how these rules apply is essential to understanding what an intersection claim is worth.

Shared fault and the deadline

Massachusetts applies modified comparative negligence under MGL c.231 §85, which is central in intersection cases because insurers so often argue that both drivers share the blame. You can recover as long as you were not more than half at fault, with the award reduced by your share, so even a partly disputed claim is worth pursuing. Most claims must be filed within three years under MGL c.260 §2A, but the evidence that proves who had the right of way is always easiest to secure early. Comparative negligence is the lever insurers reach for first in these cases, precisely because intersection fault can look ambiguous. If they can pin even a modest share of the blame on you, for supposedly speeding, for a late reaction, or for entering on a stale yellow, they shrink what they owe by that percentage. Meeting that argument with objective evidence of who actually had the right of way is often the single most valuable thing done in the entire claim.

Where intersection crashes happen and who they hurt.

The crossings where they happen

Intersection crashes strike at busy signalized junctions, at four-way stops, at highway on-ramps, and at the quiet corners where a driver rolls through without looking. Most involve the everyday collisions our Boston car accident lawyer team handles, but the danger grows with size and exposure. When a truck runs a light or misjudges a turn, a Boston truck accident lawyer confronts the far greater forces at play, and a Boston motorcycle accident lawyer knows that a left-turning driver who fails to see a rider is one of the deadliest hazards a motorcyclist faces.

The most vulnerable at every corner

Intersections are also where drivers and the most vulnerable road users meet. A Boston bicycle accident lawyer, a Boston scooter accident lawyer, and a Boston pedestrian accident lawyer represent riders and walkers struck in the crosswalk by a driver turning or running a light, where the harm is almost always severe. When the at-fault driver was working for a rideshare company, a Boston rideshare accident lawyer works through the additional insurance layers involved.

When an intersection crash turns serious

A hard side-impact at an intersection can cause the gravest injuries on the road. A Boston brain injury lawyer becomes involved when the crash causes a concussion or worse, and the same forces can leave lasting spinal harm. Across every one of these cases, the theme holds: an intersection crash is decided by proving who had the right of way, and measured by everything the collision took. Beneath the different vehicles and victims, every intersection case asks the same question and answers it the same way. The question is who was required to yield and failed to; the answer comes not from whoever tells the more confident story, but from the evidence of what the signals showed and where the vehicles were. Establishing that sequence cleanly is what turns a contested crash into a claim an insurer can no longer wave away, and it is the core of what these cases require.

The injuries an intersection crash can cause.

The harm from an intersection crash ranges from minor to catastrophic, and a full claim breaks it into the injuries felt now and the ones that last. In the short term, a side-impact or turning collision commonly brings whiplash and neck strain, broken bones, bruised or fractured ribs, and cuts from shattered side glass. The lasting effects are what most often surprise people, because the side of a vehicle offers so little crumple space that the forces reach the occupant almost directly, producing traumatic brain injury, spinal and disc damage, internal injuries, and the chronic pain and reduced mobility that can persist for years.

For a pedestrian, cyclist, or scooter rider struck at a crossing, the outcome is graver still. The categories below are a starting point rather than a limit, and a single intersection crash frequently causes several at once, which is why they are valued together and proven with a consistent medical record rather than downplayed to match a modest-looking scene. What makes intersection injuries deceptive is that the scene can look survivable while the harm is anything but. A car struck squarely on the door may show less dramatic damage than a high-speed rear-end, yet do far more to the person inside, because the force arrives with almost nothing between it and the body.

That is why these injuries should never be judged by a glance at the intersection afterward, and why a claim handled properly follows the medical evidence, not the first impression, to whatever the crash actually did. The number at the end should reflect the injury a person truly carries, not the tidiness of the photographs.

Side-Impact and Whiplash Injuries

Traumatic Brain Injury

Spinal and Internal Injuries

Pedestrian and Cyclist Harm

How an intersection accident claim is built.

Preserve the signal and camera data

Note the traffic signals, find nearby cameras, and get the names of any witnesses at the scene, because the proof of who had the right of way is exactly what disappears in the first day after a crash.

Get prompt medical care and records

See a doctor promptly even if you feel only shaken, because the neck, back, and head injuries a side-impact crash causes can surface days later, and an early record ties them clearly to the collision.

Let a lawyer prove who was at fault

Before you accept the other driver's story, let a lawyer settle who was at fault, because an intersection case turns on evidence rather than accounts, and that proof favors whoever preserves it first.

Talk to an intersection accident lawyer today.

When fault at an intersection comes down to one driver’s word against another’s, the side that gathers the proof first usually prevails. Tell us what happened, and we will move quickly to preserve the signal data, camera footage, and witness accounts, document your injuries, and pursue the full value of your claim, from medical bills and lost wages to the pain the crash caused. There is no charge to talk, no pressure, and no fee unless we win. The sooner we begin, the more of the evidence we can protect.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.

Our Clients.

Our Practice Areas.

Intersection crashes injure drivers, riders, and pedestrians across Boston and the surrounding communities every day, and they often come down to a contested question of who had the right of way. If you are unsure how an intersection claim applies to your situation, we can walk you through it in plain terms at no cost and with no obligation.

Personal injury law in Boston answered directly.

Do I have a personal injury claim?

You may, if someone else’s carelessness caused your injury. The key questions are whether another person or company was negligent, whether that negligence caused your injury, and how serious the harm is. Many people are unsure whether their situation rises to a claim, especially when an insurer downplays it. A free review with an attorney is the best way to find out, because we can look at the facts, the evidence, and the insurance and tell you honestly whether you have a case and what it may be worth, at no cost to you.

We handle the full range of serious injury and wrongful death cases, including car, truck, motorcycle, bus, rideshare, bicycle, and pedestrian crashes, slip and fall and other premises injuries, dog bites and animal attacks, injuries from dangerous or defective products, and fatal accidents. What these cases share is that someone was hurt by conduct that should not have happened. If you are not sure whether your situation fits, the simplest thing is to ask; the review is free, and we will tell you honestly whether we can help.

It depends on the severity of the injuries and their lasting effects. Value can reflect past and future medical care, lost wages and reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and the long-term impact of a serious or permanent injury, along with property damage in a crash. Every case is different, and the future care is often the largest part of a serious claim. Be cautious of anyone who promises a number up front; a careful attorney evaluates the claim only after reviewing how the injury happened and the full medical picture.

You can still recover as long as you were not more than half to blame. Under comparative negligence, MGL Chapter 231 Section 85, your compensation is reduced by your share of fault but not eliminated unless that share passes fifty percent. Insurers often exaggerate the injured person’s role to cut what they pay, sometimes based on little evidence. An attorney can present the full picture of how the injury happened and protect your recovery from an unfair or inflated fault argument.

It is best to be cautious. The other side’s insurer, and sometimes even your own, may contact you quickly and sound friendly, but their goal is to limit what they pay, and an early recorded statement can be used against you while you are still hurting. You are not required to give one. An attorney can deal with the insurers for you, so you do not say something that is later taken out of context, and so the focus stays on the other side’s fault and your recovery rather than on the insurer’s bottom line.

Most injury claims must be filed within three years under MGL Chapter 260 Section 2A, and for an injured child the deadline is paused under MGL Chapter 260 Section 7. Claims involving a city or other public entity can carry much shorter notice deadlines. Because evidence fades and cameras record over their footage within days, it is best to act soon so the proof can be preserved well before any deadline approaches.

You can. Larson Law handles injury claims on a contingency fee, which means there is no charge unless we recover money for you, and the first review is always free. We advance the costs of investigating the claim and working with any experts the case needs. You do not pay out of pocket while you recover, and we are only paid from a successful result. That arrangement exists so that anyone, regardless of their finances, can afford strong legal help after a serious injury.

For a minor injury you may not, but for any serious injury an attorney usually makes a real difference. Insurers settle for less when no lawyer is involved, and the rules around fault, deadlines, and coverage are easy to get wrong on your own. An attorney levels the field, handles the insurers, proves the claim, and pursues the full value while you focus on recovering. Because the first review is free and we work on a contingency fee, there is no cost to find out whether you need one and what your claim may be worth.

It depends on the case. Some claims resolve in a matter of months through negotiation, while others, especially serious injuries that are still healing or cases an insurer refuses to value fairly, take longer and may require filing suit. It is usually wise not to settle until the full extent of your injuries is known, since you generally cannot reopen a claim later. An attorney can give you a realistic timeline for your situation and work to move the case as efficiently as possible without leaving money on the table.

If an injury proved fatal, close family may bring a wrongful death claim under MGL Chapter 229. Such a claim can seek compensation for the loss of the person’s income, services, companionship, and guidance, along with funeral and related expenses. These cases are painful and the legal steps are complex, and an attorney can handle the investigation and the filings so the family can focus on each other, never paying anything up front and owing a fee only if there is a recovery.

Nothing upfront. Larson Law handles personal injury claims on a contingency fee, so there is no charge unless we recover money for you, and the first review is always free. We advance the costs of investigating the claim, obtaining the records, and working with experts. We are only paid from a successful result, which lets an injured person take on the insurers without paying out of pocket while they recover, so cost is never a reason to wait to find out what your claim may be worth.

Get medical care right away, even if you feel okay, since some injuries appear hours or days later, and keep every record. Write down how it happened, photograph the scene, the cause, and your injuries, and get the names of any witnesses while it is fresh. Report the accident as appropriate. Avoid giving the insurer a recorded statement or signing anything before you have spoken with an attorney, who can preserve the evidence and protect both your health and your claim from the start.

Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.