LEFT TURN ACCIDENT LAWYER
The other driver
turned across your path
- No fee unless we win
- Same-day response
- Free case review
As Seen On:
What a Left Turn Accident Lawyer Proves
Few crashes feel as unfair as being hit by a car turning left in front of you. You had the right of way, you were going straight through an intersection you were entitled to cross, and another driver turned directly across your path. In most of these crashes the turning driver is at fault, because Massachusetts law requires a driver making a left turn to yield to oncoming traffic that is close enough to be a hazard. Yet insurers still fight these claims, and they often try to shift some or all of the blame onto the person who was simply driving straight.
That is why even a seemingly clear left-turn case has to be built carefully. The turning driver’s insurer may argue that you were speeding, that you ran a yellow or red light, or, if you were on a motorcycle, that you were somehow hard to see. Answering those arguments takes evidence, the intersection and its signals, the points of impact on the two vehicles, independent witnesses, and any dashcam or traffic-camera video, so that the record shows who actually had the right of way.
Left-turn crashes are also among the most dangerous, especially for motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. A driver who misjudges an oncoming motorcycle’s speed, or never sees it at all, turns left into its path with devastating results. The physics are unforgiving, and the injuries are often severe, which makes proving fault and documenting the full harm all the more important.
None of that should fall on the person who was hurt while doing everything right. Bringing in a lawyer early means the investigation, the preservation of the intersection evidence and any video, and the pressure from the insurer all become the firm’s responsibility rather than yours.
There is a common thread in how these crashes are described, and it is worth naming. Turning drivers, and their insurers, often say the other vehicle came out of nowhere or was going too fast, especially when the person hit was on a motorcycle. Studies of these collisions consistently show the opposite: the turning driver simply did not look carefully enough, or looked and misjudged. Massachusetts law does not excuse that. A driver who cannot complete a left turn safely is required to wait, and the failure to wait, not the mere presence of oncoming traffic, is what causes the crash. Establishing that, with the physical evidence and independent accounts, is what turns the insurer’s narrative around.
Our firm builds these cases to withstand the insurer’s attempt to shift blame. Larson Law is led by attorney Daniel J. Larson, a Boston personal injury attorney who treats a left-turn crash as a right-of-way question to be answered with evidence, and who documents the intersection and the impacts before that proof is gone.
What our clients say
Why Injured Clients Trust Larson Law
- We treat a left-turn crash as a right-of-way case, and we prove who was actually entitled to go
- We document the intersection, the signals, and the points of impact before that evidence disappears
- We answer the speeding and ran-the-light defenses insurers use to shift blame onto the driver going straight
- We understand why drivers turn into motorcycles and bikes, and how to prove the failure to yield
- We prepare every case as if it will be tried, which is what moves an insurer toward the full value
- No fee unless we win
- Free, private consultation
- Straight answers, no jargon
- We return your calls
$300K+ Won For Clients
100+ 5-Star Google Reviews
8+ Years of Legal Expertise
98% Legal Success Rate
100+ Injured Victims Helped
No Win, No Fee Guaranteed
How Right of Way Works in a Left Turn
A left-turn claim usually turns on a single question, who had the right of way, and a handful of Massachusetts rules decide how that question is answered and what your claim is worth.
The duty to yield. A driver turning left must yield to any oncoming vehicle that is close enough to be an immediate hazard. When a driver turns across the path of a car, motorcycle, or bicycle that had the right of way, that failure to yield is negligence, and it is usually the direct cause of the crash. Why it matters: this rule puts the fault on the turning driver in the great majority of these crashes, which is exactly why the insurer’s strategy is to attack it by claiming you did something wrong.
Comparative negligence and the insurer’s counterattack. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, you can recover as long as your share of fault is not greater than the other side’s, with any award reduced by your percentage of blame, and the statute abolishes the old assumption-of-risk defense. Why it matters: because the turning driver is usually at fault, the insurer’s only real move is to pin some blame on you, for speed, for the light, for being hard to see, so keeping your share low with solid evidence directly protects the value of the claim.
The tort threshold. After a crash, no-fault Personal Injury Protection pays your first bills regardless of fault, but it does not pay for pain and suffering. Under G.L. c. 231, § 6D, you may pursue pain and suffering only if your reasonable medical expenses exceed two thousand dollars, or the injury causes death, permanent disfigurement, loss of a body function, or a fracture. Why it matters: left-turn crashes, especially those involving motorcycles, routinely cause fractures and worse, which clears the threshold and opens a full claim beyond PIP.
The deadline. Under G.L. c. 260, § 2A, you generally have three years from the crash to sue. Why it matters: intersection video is often overwritten within days and witness memories fade quickly, so while the legal deadline is measured in years, the practical deadline to capture the proof of right of way is measured in days.
These rules work together in a typical case. You are riding or driving straight through a green light; a car turns left across your lane; the duty to yield makes the turning driver at fault; the insurer responds by claiming you were speeding; comparative negligence then decides how that dispute affects the recovery; and the tort threshold governs the pain-and-suffering piece while the three-year clock runs. Winning the right-of-way argument with evidence is what keeps the insurer’s blame-shifting from eroding a claim that the law otherwise favors.
Coverage can involve more than the turning driver’s policy. Your own PIP and any underinsured-motorist coverage may apply, especially in a severe motorcycle case where the at-fault driver’s limits fall short of the harm. Identifying every available source of recovery early is often what separates a partial result from a full one.
It also helps to understand how right of way is actually proven. The angle and location of the damage tell a story: a strike to the side of the through vehicle and the front of the turning vehicle is the classic signature of a failure to yield. Signal-timing records can show which direction had the green. Independent witnesses and any traffic or business camera can fix who entered the intersection lawfully. And in disputed cases, an accident reconstruction can use the physical evidence to estimate speeds and confirm that the oncoming vehicle was close enough that the turn should never have been attempted. Each piece answers the insurer’s blame-shifting with something concrete, which is why gathering it quickly is the heart of a left-turn case.
Left Turn Accident Lawyer Serving Massachusetts
From our Boston base we represent people hurt in left-turn crashes across the Commonwealth. These collisions happen at intersections everywhere, at the busy junctions and rotaries around Greater Boston, on the state routes that cross the region, and on the local roads of the South Shore, the north, and the west. Wherever the intersection was, the same right-of-way rules and the same evidence-first approach apply.
We handle these crashes across every form they take, serving as a Boston car accident lawyer when one car turns across another’s path, and as a Boston motorcycle accident lawyer when a driver turns left into a rider a court will find the driver simply failed to see. That work reaches well beyond the city, including the cases a Cambridge personal injury lawyer handles just across the river.
A left-turn crash also rarely produces a single kind of harm. The direct, often high-speed impact drives much of your pain and the lasting disruption it leaves behind, it can cause the kind of life-altering, permanent injury these crashes are known for, and at its worst it takes a life, leaving a family to pursue everything a wrongful death costs them. We make sure each of those dimensions is valued.
Where the crash happened also shapes the proof. An intersection may be covered by a municipal traffic camera or a nearby business’s surveillance, and the signal timing may be documented by the city or the state; on a state road the crash may fall under State Police jurisdiction. Knowing which agency responded, which cameras exist, and which county court will hear the claim is part of building it, and prompt preservation letters are often what save intersection video before it is overwritten.
Wherever the case arises, the standard does not change. We represent left-turn crash victims from the intersections and rotaries of Greater Boston to the state routes of central and western Massachusetts, with the same insistence on proving right of way with real evidence everywhere. A serious left-turn crash deserves that rigor no matter where it happened, and no matter how hard an insurer works to blame the driver who had the right to go.
The intersections where these crashes happen are as varied as the state itself, from a busy signalized junction in the city to a rotary on the South Shore to a rural state-route crossing to the west, and each carries its own evidence, its own responding agency, and its own court. What does not change is the fragility of the proof. The camera that captured the turn may overwrite its footage in days, and the witness who saw the light may be impossible to find a week later. Wherever the crash happened, our first move is the same: identify and preserve the right-of-way evidence before it is gone, because in a left-turn case that evidence is often the difference between a claim the law favors and one an insurer picks apart.
At its core a left-turn crash is a failure to yield the right of way, the very duty the turning driver owed you.
What a Left Turn Crash Really Costs You
A left-turn crash is easy for an insurer to muddy with blame-shifting and hard for the person hurt in it to overstate. The cost of a direct intersection impact reaches far past the first hospital bill, and a full claim means proving each layer of it.
The medical picture. Left-turn collisions, especially against motorcycles and bicycles, produce serious injuries, fractures, head and spinal trauma, and internal injuries, that often require surgery, long rehabilitation, and lasting care. We gather the complete medical record and the treating opinions so the diagnosis, the cause, and the prognosis are documented rather than argued.
The work and earning picture. Injuries this serious frequently keep people out of work for months or end a career. We show how they limit what you can do and where they support a claim for lost wages and diminished future earning capacity, not just the paychecks already missed.
The daily and future picture. Chronic pain, disability, future surgeries and care, and the loss of the life you had before are real damages that must be valued now rather than after the fact. We tie each to evidence and, where the stakes justify it, bring in medical, vocational, and reconstruction experts.
Neutralizing the blame-shift. The defense in almost every left-turn case is to claim you were speeding, ran the light, or were hard to see. We answer it with the signal timing, the points of impact, independent witnesses, and any video, so the attempt to move fault onto you has nothing to stand on.
It is worth knowing what to avoid, too. Do not accept the turning driver’s version at the scene, and do not apologize or guess about your speed to the police or an insurer; those words get used against you. Do not give a recorded statement or accept a quick settlement before the right-of-way evidence is secured and your injuries are fully understood. We handle the insurer’s questions so an offhand remark never becomes the centerpiece of the defense against you.
Finally, a left-turn case rewards moving quickly and then being patient. The intersection video and witnesses must be secured within days, but the value of the claim cannot be known until your injuries are fully treated and the investigation is complete. We do the urgent work immediately and then build the case methodically, so that when the time comes to negotiate, the demand rests on proven right of way and a complete medical picture rather than a guess.
It is also worth being honest about how these cases unfold. Because the injuries in a left-turn crash are often severe, particularly for riders, the medical picture can take months to become clear, and the true value of the claim cannot be known until it does. An insurer may offer a quick settlement precisely because it knows the number will climb once the full extent of the harm, the surgeries, the permanent limitations, and the lost earning power, is documented. We secure the liability evidence immediately and then let the medical picture develop fully, so that the demand reflects the whole cost of the crash rather than the discounted version an early offer represents.
The through-line is simple: liability in a left-turn case is usually on your side, but only if the proof of right of way is captured before it disappears and the full extent of your injuries is documented before you settle. We handle both halves of that, the fast liability work and the patient medical work, so that a crash the law already favors becomes a claim an insurer cannot talk its way out of, and so the recovery reflects everything the turn took from you.
Emergency and Surgical Care
Lost Wages and Earning Capacity
Pain, Suffering, and Trauma
Wrongful Death of a Loved One
Hit in a Left Turn? Do These Things
Get to safety and photograph it all
If able, photograph the intersection, the signals, the skid marks, and the damage to both vehicles from several angles before it moves, because that scene record often proves who had the right of way.
Note names of anyone who saw it all
Get the name and number of every witness before they leave, because a left-turn case often comes down to who had the light, and an independent account of what happened often makes the difference here.
Speak to a lawyer before you settle
Talk to a lawyer before you give a recorded statement or accept any offer, because the insurer will try to blame you for speed or the light, and a free review protects the video, the proof, and value.
- 5.0 stars out of 100+ reviews
Talk to a Left Turn Accident Lawyer Today
If a driver turned left across your path and left you or someone you love seriously hurt, do not let the insurer rewrite what happened before the evidence is secured. Our team will listen to what happened, move to preserve the intersection video and the witness accounts, prove who had the right of way, explain how Massachusetts law applies, and take on the insurer so you can focus on recovery. The consultation is free and private, and because we work on a contingency fee, you owe nothing unless we win. Reaching out early is what preserves the proof your claim depends on.
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.
Our Clients.
Our Practice Areas.
Larson Law helps injured people and families across Massachusetts after a serious accident. If you were hurt by someone else’s carelessness in Boston, we are ready to listen and explain your options at no cost.
Questions Drivers and Riders Ask
Who is usually at fault in a left-turn crash?
Usually the driver making the left turn. Massachusetts requires a left-turning driver to yield to oncoming traffic that is close enough to be a hazard, so turning across the path of a car, motorcycle, or bicycle that had the right of way is typically negligence and the direct cause of the crash.
Does the turning driver always lose?
Not automatically, but the law strongly favors the driver who was going straight. The turning driver can avoid or reduce fault only by showing the other driver did something wrong, such as running a red light or speeding well over the limit. Absent real proof of that, the failure to yield controls, which is why the evidence matters.
What if the insurer says I was speeding?
That is the insurer’s most common counterattack. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, even if you were partly at fault you can still recover, as long as you were not more than half responsible, with any award reduced by your share. The claim that you were speeding must be proven, which the evidence often disproves.
I was on a motorcycle, does that change things?
It often makes the case both stronger and more serious. Drivers frequently turn left into motorcyclists because they misjudge a bike’s speed or never see it, which is still a failure to yield. But the injuries are usually far more severe, so proving the driver’s fault and documenting the full, lasting harm both become critical.
Why do witnesses and video matter so much?
Because a left-turn case often comes down to who had the right of way, and that is exactly what an independent witness or a video can establish. A neutral account of who had the green light, or footage of the turn, can defeat the insurer’s blame-shifting. That proof is fragile, though, since video is overwritten and memories fade within days.
Can I recover for pain and suffering?
Usually, yes. Under G.L. c. 231, § 6D, a crash victim can seek pain and suffering once reasonable medical bills exceed two thousand dollars or the injury is a fracture, permanent, or fatal. The serious injuries typical of a left-turn collision, especially against a motorcycle, almost always clear that threshold, opening a full claim beyond PIP.
What if I was partly at fault?
You can still recover. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, Massachusetts follows comparative negligence, so being partly at fault reduces your award by your share of blame but does not bar it, as long as you are not more than half responsible. Because the turning driver usually holds most of the fault, this often has a limited effect.
How long do I have to file?
Generally three years from the date of the crash under G.L. c. 260, § 2A. But the practical deadline is much shorter, because intersection video is often overwritten within days and witnesses become hard to find. Contacting a lawyer immediately protects both the legal deadline and the fragile proof of right of way.
What if the crash was fatal?
Then the family may bring a wrongful death claim against the turning driver. These cases carry the same right-of-way analysis but far higher stakes, and preserving the intersection evidence and witness accounts is even more important. We handle such claims with care for the family while pursuing full accountability for the loss.
What should I not do after the crash?
Do not accept the turning driver’s version at the scene, and do not apologize or guess about your speed to the police or an insurer, because those words get used against you. Do not give a recorded statement or accept a quick settlement before the right-of-way evidence is secured and your injuries are fully understood.
What does a lawyer cost?
Nothing up front. We handle left-turn and other crash cases on a contingency fee, so you pay no attorney fee unless we recover for you, and the first consultation is always free and confidential. That lets you get the crash investigated and your options explained with no financial risk during a hard time.
Who will handle my case?
Attorney Daniel J. Larson leads the firm and stays personally involved in the cases we take. You will work with a lawyer who knows the facts of your crash and the right-of-way evidence, not just a file number, and who builds your claim with the intersection proof, the witnesses, and the records it needs.
Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.