LANE SPLITTING ACCIDENT LAWYER
Riding between lanes
does not erase your rights
- No fee unless we win
- Same-day response
- Free case review
As Seen On:
What a Lane Splitting Accident Lawyer Can Do
Lane splitting, riding a motorcycle between two lanes of slowed or stopped traffic, is not legal in Massachusetts. Many riders assume that fact ends the conversation, that being hit while splitting lanes means no claim and no recovery. That is not how Massachusetts law works. Doing something the law prohibits can count against you, but it does not automatically erase your right to be compensated when a careless driver also caused the crash.
The reason lies in how Massachusetts handles fault. Breaking a traffic law is treated as evidence that a rider was negligent, but it is not, by itself, a complete bar to recovery. If a driver changed lanes without signaling or looking, drifted across the line, opened a door into the gap, or otherwise drove carelessly, that driver shares responsibility for what happened. The real question is not simply whether the rider was splitting lanes, but how the fault is divided between the rider and the driver, and that is a question of evidence, not assumption.
These cases are difficult precisely because the insurer will try to put all of the blame on the rider and none on its driver. Answering that takes proof, the positions and damage on both vehicles, whether the driver signaled, any dashcam or traffic video, and independent witnesses, so the full picture of what each person did is on the record rather than just the insurer’s version.
None of that should fall on an injured rider alone, especially given how serious motorcycle injuries tend to be. Bringing in a lawyer early means the investigation, the preservation of the evidence that shows the driver’s share of fault, and the pressure from the insurer all become the firm’s responsibility rather than yours.
The most damaging thing about a lane-splitting crash is often not the crash itself but the belief that follows it. Riders are frequently told, sometimes by the other driver, sometimes by an adjuster, and sometimes by people who mean well, that because they were between the lanes they have no claim and should just walk away. Many do, and they leave real compensation on the table. The truth is more hopeful and more complicated: the law asks how the fault should be divided, not whether the rider was perfect, and that division is decided by evidence a rider is entitled to gather and a lawyer is equipped to prove.
Our firm takes these hard cases seriously. Larson Law is led by attorney Daniel J. Larson, a Boston personal injury attorney who understands that a rider who was splitting lanes can still be owed compensation when a driver was also at fault, and who builds the evidence needed to prove that driver’s share.
What our clients say
Why Injured Riders Trust Larson Law
- We take lane-splitting cases the insurer calls hopeless, and we prove the driver’s share of the fault
- We know Massachusetts treats breaking a traffic law as evidence of fault, not an automatic bar to recovery
- We document both vehicles, the signals, and any video before the proof of the driver’s carelessness is gone
- We understand how severe motorcycle injuries are and how to document their full, lasting cost
- We prepare every case as if it will be tried, which is what moves an insurer toward a fair value
- No fee unless we win
- Free, private consultation
- Straight answers, no jargon
- We return your calls
$300K+ Won For Clients
100+ 5-Star Google Reviews
8+ Years of Legal Expertise
98% Legal Success Rate
100+ Injured Victims Helped
No Win, No Fee Guaranteed
How Fault Works When You Ride Between Lanes
A lane-splitting claim lives or dies on how Massachusetts divides fault, so understanding a few rules is what separates a case worth pursuing from one an insurer talks a rider out of.
Breaking a law is evidence, not a verdict. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, the violation of a traffic statute by an injured person is considered evidence of that person’s negligence, but the statute is explicit that it does not, for that reason alone and as a matter of law, bar recovery. Why it matters: this is the heart of a lane-splitting case. Being between the lanes hurts the rider’s position, but it does not end the claim, and the rider can still recover if a jury could find the driver was also at fault.
Comparative negligence and the fifty-percent line. The same statute lets an injured person recover as long as their share of fault is not greater than the combined fault of those they sue, with any award reduced by their percentage of blame. Why it matters: in a lane-splitting case the entire battle is over that percentage. If the rider is found fifty percent or less at fault, they recover a reduced amount; if more than fifty percent, they recover nothing, so proving the driver’s carelessness is what keeps the rider on the right side of that line.
The driver still owed a duty. A driver is not free to act carelessly just because a rider was splitting lanes. Changing lanes without signaling or checking a mirror, drifting over a lane line, opening a door into traffic, or otherwise failing to pay attention is negligence that can make the driver share, or even carry most of, the fault. Why it matters: the driver’s own conduct is where a rider’s recovery comes from, which is why the evidence of what the driver did is the center of the case.
The tort threshold and the deadline. After a crash, no-fault PIP pays first bills, but under G.L. c. 231, § 6D you may pursue pain and suffering only if reasonable medical expenses exceed two thousand dollars or the injury is a fracture, permanent, or fatal, and under G.L. c. 260, § 2A you generally have three years to sue. Why it matters: motorcycle injuries almost always clear the threshold, and the three-year clock runs while the video and witnesses that could prove the driver’s fault disappear.
Put together, these rules explain why a lane-splitting case is winnable but hard. The rider’s violation is a headwind, comparative negligence sets the exact stakes, the driver’s duty is the source of recovery, and the tort threshold opens the door to full damages. Every one of those turns on evidence of how the crash actually happened, which is why building the record quickly matters so much.
Coverage is worth mapping early, too. The at-fault driver’s liability policy, your own PIP, and any underinsured-motorist coverage can all apply, and in a severe motorcycle injury the driver’s limits may fall short of the harm. Identifying every source of recovery is often what makes a reduced-but-real recovery a meaningful one.
A short example shows how these rules play out. Suppose a rider moves between two lanes of stopped highway traffic and a driver, without signaling or checking a mirror, swings into that gap to change lanes and strikes the motorcycle. The rider’s lane splitting is evidence of negligence and will weigh against the rider. But the driver’s failure to signal and look is also negligence, and a jury could reasonably assign a large share of the fault to the driver. If it assigns the rider forty percent and the driver sixty, the rider recovers sixty percent of the damages. Change the facts, and the split changes with them, which is exactly why the evidence of what the driver did is the difference between a real recovery and none.
Lane Splitting Accident Lawyer Serving Massachusetts
From our Boston base we represent riders hurt while lane splitting across the Commonwealth. These crashes happen wherever traffic slows and a rider moves between the lanes, on the congested highways and bridges around Greater Boston, on the commuter routes that feed the city, and on the roads of the South Shore, the north, and the west. Wherever it happened, the same Massachusetts fault rules and the same evidence-first approach apply.
We handle these cases as a Boston motorcycle accident lawyer who does not walk away when a rider was between the lanes, and we deal with the at-fault driver’s insurer the way we would in any crash, including as a Boston car accident lawyer when a careless driver caused the collision. That work reaches well beyond the city, including the cases a Cambridge personal injury lawyer handles just across the river.
A lane-splitting crash also rarely produces a single kind of harm, because motorcycle injuries are severe. The impact drives much of your pain and the lasting disruption it leaves behind, it can cause the kind of life-altering, permanent injury riders so often suffer, and at its worst it takes a life, leaving a family to pursue everything a wrongful death costs them. We make sure each of those dimensions is valued.
Where the crash happened also shapes the proof of the driver’s fault. A highway crash may fall under State Police jurisdiction and produce a detailed report; a city street may be covered by a traffic or business camera that captured whether the driver signaled; the positions of the vehicles and the damage tell their own story. Knowing which agency responded, which cameras exist, and which county court will hear the claim is part of building it, and prompt preservation letters are often what save the video before it is overwritten.
Wherever the case arises, the standard does not change. We represent riders from the highways and interchanges of Greater Boston to the commuter corridors of central and western Massachusetts, with the same insistence on proving the driver’s share of fault with real evidence everywhere. A serious lane-splitting crash deserves that rigor no matter where it happened, and no matter how quickly an insurer tries to blame the rider for everything.
These crashes cluster where traffic backs up and a rider is tempted to move through it, at the approaches to bridges and tunnels, on the jammed stretches of the interstates that ring Boston, and on any commuter route that slows to a crawl at rush hour. Those same locations are often watched by traffic cameras and lined with businesses whose cameras may have caught the crash, but that footage is fragile and short-lived. Wherever in Massachusetts the crash happened, the first task is to find and preserve whatever shows what the driver did, because in a case decided by percentages of fault, a few seconds of video can be worth more than any argument.
Because everything here turns on percentages of blame, the case is ultimately governed by how Massachusetts divides fault between a rider and a driver.
What a Lane Splitting Crash Really Costs You
A lane-splitting crash is easy for an insurer to dismiss and hard for the injured rider to overstate. The cost of a motorcycle crash reaches far past the first hospital bill, and even a claim reduced by comparative fault is worth building fully.
The medical picture. Motorcycle riders have little between them and the road, so these crashes produce the most serious injuries, fractures, road rash, head and spinal trauma, and internal injuries, that often require surgery, long rehabilitation, and lasting care. We gather the complete medical record and the treating opinions so the diagnosis, the cause, and the prognosis are documented rather than argued.
The work and earning picture. Injuries this serious frequently keep riders out of work for months or end a career. We show how they limit what you can do and where they support a claim for lost wages and diminished future earning capacity, not just the paychecks already missed.
The daily and future picture. Chronic pain, disability, future surgeries and care, and the loss of the life you had before are real damages that must be valued now rather than after the fact. We tie each to evidence and, where the stakes justify it, bring in medical, vocational, and reconstruction experts.
Winning the fault fight. Everything in a lane-splitting case comes back to the split of fault, so we build the evidence of the driver’s carelessness, the failure to signal, the unsafe lane change, the opened door, the distraction, and keep the rider’s share as low as the facts allow, because every point of comparative fault changes what the claim is worth.
It is worth knowing what to avoid, too. Do not admit fault or accept the driver’s story at the scene, and do not guess about your speed or position to the police or an insurer, because those words are used to raise your share of fault. Do not give a recorded statement or accept a quick settlement before the driver’s carelessness is documented and your injuries are understood. We handle the insurer’s questions so an offhand remark never becomes the centerpiece of the defense against you.
Finally, one honest word about these cases. Because a lane-splitting rider usually carries some fault, the recovery may be reduced, and no lawyer can promise otherwise. What we can do is make sure the reduction reflects the real facts rather than the insurer’s exaggeration, and that the driver’s genuine share of the blame is paid in full. Building the evidence is what turns a case the insurer calls hopeless into a real, if reduced, recovery.
We are candid with riders from the first conversation. A lane-splitting case is harder than a typical crash, and the recovery will likely be reduced by the rider’s share of fault. But harder is not hopeless, and reduced is not nothing. When a serious injury is involved, even a recovery cut by comparative fault can be substantial and can make a real difference in a rider’s life. Our job is to make certain the reduction is fair, grounded in the actual facts rather than an insurer’s effort to blame the rider for everything, and that whatever share of the fault the driver truly bears is paid in full.
One practical point deserves emphasis. In a case decided by percentages, small pieces of evidence carry outsized weight, a single frame of video showing no turn signal, a witness who saw the driver drift, a damage pattern that matches an unsafe lane change. We chase those details early and hard, because moving the fault line even ten or fifteen percent in a serious-injury case can change the recovery meaningfully. That is the work behind a lane-splitting claim, and it is work we take on so an injured rider does not have to fight the insurer while trying to heal.
Emergency and Surgical Care
Lost Wages and Earning Capacity
Pain, Suffering, and Trauma
Wrongful Death of a Loved One
Hurt Splitting Lanes? Do These Things
Get medical care, keep every report
Get treated right away and keep every bill, report, and photo, because motorcycle injuries are serious and a documented, consistent medical record is what proves the true, full and lasting cost of it.
Record what the careless driver did
Photograph both vehicles, their positions, the lane lines, and any turn signal, and note whether the driver changed lanes or opened a door, since that proof of the driver fault is what you recover on.
Speak to a lawyer before you settle
Talk to a lawyer before you give a recorded statement or accept any offer, because the insurer will pin all the blame on you, and a free review shows what the other driver owes for the fault involved.
- 5.0 stars out of 100+ reviews
Talk to a Lane Splitting Accident Lawyer
If you were hurt splitting lanes and have been told you have no case, get a second opinion before you believe it. Massachusetts law does not automatically bar a rider who was between the lanes, and if a careless driver shared the blame you may still be owed real compensation. Our team will listen to what happened, move to preserve the evidence of the driver’s fault, explain exactly how comparative negligence applies to your crash, and take on the insurer so you can focus on recovery. The consultation is free and private, and you owe nothing unless we win. Reaching out early is what preserves the proof your claim depends on.
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not include confidential information. Contacting us does not obligate you to retain our services.
Our Clients.
Our Practice Areas.
Larson Law helps injured people and families across Massachusetts after a serious accident. If you were hurt by someone else’s carelessness in Boston, we are ready to listen and explain your options at no cost.
Questions Riders Ask Us Most
Is lane splitting legal in Massachusetts?
No. Lane splitting, riding between lanes of traffic, is not permitted in Massachusetts, and a rider doing it can be found partly at fault for a resulting crash. But being partly at fault is very different from having no claim, which is where many riders are misled.
If it is illegal, do I have any case at all?
Often, yes. Under Massachusetts law, breaking a traffic rule is evidence of negligence but is not, by itself, an automatic bar to recovery. If a careless driver also caused the crash, you can still pursue a claim, reduced by your share of fault, as long as that share is not more than half.
How does breaking the law affect my claim?
It counts against you as evidence, not as an automatic loss. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, the violation of a traffic statute is considered evidence of the rider’s negligence, but the statute says plainly that it does not, for that reason alone, bar recovery. The fault is then divided between rider and driver.
What makes the driver responsible?
The driver’s own carelessness. A driver who changes lanes without signaling or checking, drifts over a lane line, opens a door into the gap, or is distracted breaches a duty of care that exists regardless of what the rider was doing. That breach is negligence, and it is the source of the rider’s recovery.
How is fault actually divided?
By the evidence of what each person did. The positions and damage on both vehicles, whether the driver signaled, any video, and witness accounts let a jury assign a percentage of fault to each. In a lane-splitting case, that percentage is the whole ballgame, which is why documenting the driver’s conduct quickly is essential.
Can I recover for pain and suffering?
Usually, yes, if you can recover at all. Under G.L. c. 231, § 6D, a crash victim can seek pain and suffering once reasonable medical bills exceed two thousand dollars or the injury is a fracture, permanent, or fatal. Motorcycle injuries almost always clear that threshold, so the pain-and-suffering claim is available once fault is established.
How much could my recovery be reduced?
It depends entirely on your share of fault. Under G.L. c. 231, § 85, your recovery is reduced by your percentage of blame, and if you are found more than half at fault you recover nothing. That is why proving the driver’s carelessness, and keeping your share as low as the facts allow, directly determines the outcome.
How long do I have to file?
Generally three years from the date of the crash under G.L. c. 260, § 2A. But the evidence that proves the driver’s share of fault, especially video, is often gone within days. Contacting a lawyer immediately protects both the legal deadline and the fragile proof that a reduced-but-real recovery depends on.
What if the crash was fatal?
The family may still bring a wrongful death claim, subject to the same comparative-fault analysis. The rider’s conduct is weighed against the driver’s, and if the driver shared the blame the family can recover, reduced by the rider’s share. These cases are painful and fact-intensive, and preserving the evidence early is critical.
What should I not do after the crash?
Do not admit fault or accept the driver’s story at the scene, and do not guess about your speed or position to the police or an insurer, because those words are used to raise your share of fault. Do not give a recorded statement or accept a quick settlement before the driver’s carelessness is documented and your injuries are understood.
What does a lawyer cost?
Nothing up front. We handle lane-splitting and other motorcycle cases on a contingency fee, so you pay no attorney fee unless we recover for you, and the first consultation is always free and confidential. That lets you find out whether you have a case, despite what the insurer says, with no financial risk.
Who will handle my case?
Attorney Daniel J. Larson leads the firm and stays personally involved in the cases we take. You will work with a lawyer who takes a hard, fault-divided case seriously, not just a file number, and who builds the evidence of the driver’s share of blame that your recovery depends on.
Results Disclaimer: Past case results, settlements, and verdicts mentioned on this website do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every case is unique and depends on its own facts and legal issues.